Skip to [main navigation | secondary navigation | content]
A to Z | Contact us | Text only | Cymraeg
Hill / Bryn

 

Local Development Plan

PLEASE NOTE: You only need to register / login if you wish to make representations.

If you haven't got an account you can register now.
If you have forgotten your password you can request a new password.


You can view the full details of a representation by clicking either on the Representation ID in the top right of the summary box or on the More Details... link at the bottom.

Representations on Conwy Deposit Local Development Plan (Revised Edition 2011) - 4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED

Representation ID: 26112

OBJECT Anwyl Construction Ltd (Mr Mike Pender)

Summary:

Policy HOU/1 and Contingency Sites
The release of Contingency Sites relies on the AMR to indicate the trigger points for release of Contingency Sites.
There will be no AMR for several years. There is already a deficit of 167 dwellings after two years. By the time the first AMR is produced there will be a larger shortfall again because of lack of sites and constraints on existing/allocated sites. It is imperative that Contingency Sites that can be delivered quickly are allocated and granted permission to meet the identified shortfall.

Change To Plan:

Once such Contingency Site is Glyn Farm, this site could have been started and contributed already to Phase 1 2007 - 2017 Plan period.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 26112

Representation ID: 26111

OBJECT Anwyl Construction Ltd (Mr Mike Pender)

Summary:

Capacity of the House Building Industry
The LPA contends that there is a limit on the capacity of the local house building industry to deliver more than 453 dwellings per year. The industry has delivered more than 453 dpa in four of the last twelve years, despite a recession period.
The survey, analysis and conclusions are flawed. Not all house builders responded, it is unclear who were surveyed and the percentage returns.
It does not differentiate between smaller and larger house builders. BP31 does not contain sufficient evidence to limit the total housing requirement based on building capacity.

Change To Plan:

The Plan needs to change to a figure of nearer 500 dpa.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 26111

Representation ID: 26110

OBJECT Anwyl Construction Ltd (Mr Mike Pender)

Summary:

Lack of Delivery of Identified Supply
No evidence that School sites will deliver 199 dwelling.
It is doubtful whether the local housing market could deliver the projected houses in Abergele and Bodelwyddan.
It is unlikely that Ty Mawr will deliver the completions forecast.
Tandderwen Farm and Rhuddlan Road are unlikely to deliver the forecasted completions.
There must be a doubt about the number of completions forecast on PDL.

Change To Plan:

The supply from the above sources is over-estimated and the expected shortfall is best made up by specific housing land allocations.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 26110

Representation ID: 26109

OBJECT Anwyl Construction Ltd (Mr Mike Pender)

Summary:

Housing Supply and Contingency Sites
Whilst we agree in principle to the concept of contingency sites objections are submitted:
i) to increase the figure of 1,100 dwellings
ii) that the contingency sites should be allocated based on
a) Total overall housing requirement should be increased to nearer 8,000
b) The LDP is not delivering on its 6,800 or 453 dpa in its first two years.
The SA/SEA also recommends that a specific policy with clear criteria is in place to provide clear guidance on when/how/which sites will be released.

Change To Plan:

Allocate the current list of housing contingency sites.
Identify a further set of contingency sites that could be released if required.
Include a specific LDP policy on contingency sites.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 26109

Representation ID: 26108

OBJECT Anwyl Construction Ltd (Mr Mike Pender)

Summary:

It appears that the housing figure is based mainly on the lack of capacity of the house building industry. This assumption is flawed, local house building can and has delivered in excess of 453dpa in a time of restricted housing land allocations and so completions were artificially dampened/reduced by insufficient land allocations.
The Plan is unsound as it does not provide realistic housing requirement figure to meet the expected housing needs of the area.

Change To Plan:

We consider that HOU/1 needs to change to a figure nearer the upper range of over 7,000 dwellings.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 26108

Representation ID: 22608

OBJECT Ainscough Strategic Land. (Mr Nigel McGurk) represented by N J L Consulting (Mr Nick Lee)

Summary:

The representation seeks to promote the strategic designation of the Former Aluminium Factory Site, Dolgarrog to a "Strategic Leisure led Mixed-use Economic Development site".

Change To Plan:

Change the strategic designation of the Former Aluminium Factory Site, Dolgarrog to a "Strategic Leisure led Mixed-use Economic Development site".

Amended Policy wording as detailed in the attached document.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22608

Representation ID: 22546

SUPPORT Awdurdod Parc Cenedlaethol Eryri / Snowdonia National Park Authority (. Tim Polisi a Chynlluniau Strategol Eryri)

Summary:

Profion Cadernid:

Prawf C1 - Cynllun defnydd tir yw hwn sy'n ystyried cynlluniau a pholisïau a strategaethau perthnasol eraill sy'n ymwneud â'r ardal neu ardaloedd cyfagos. Mewn perthynas â'r prawf hwn, mae Awdurdod Parc Cenedlaethol Eryri yn ystyried bod Cynllun Datblygu Lleol Conwy yn gadarn mewn perthynas â CDLl Eryri. Mae Strategaeth Dai y Cynllun yn cyd-fynd gyda Strategaeth Cynllun Datblygu Lleol Eryri ac yn cydnabod y cysylltiad rhwng anheddiadau.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22546

Representation ID: 22540

OBJECT Penmaenmawr Town Council (A M Jones)

Summary:

The overall figure of 6800 developments within the County is much too high to the current existing developments and is far too ambitious for the county to absorb without considerations for other factors such as public play areas, employment, schools, doctor, surgeries and dentistry provisions and transportation issues.

All the developments with Penmaenmawr and Dwygyfylchi appear to be on greenfield sites and no consideration has been given for existing brownfield sites.

Change To Plan:

The Town Council would welcome a substantial scaling down of the development with a need to actively seek existing brownfield sites for the developments to continue.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22540

Representation ID: 22539

OBJECT The Order of the Sisters of St Joseph of the Appartition represented by Land & Development Practice (Mr Mark Beevers)

Summary:

The LDP is unsound given that the document has an overreliance on windfall sites and extant permission to meet the housing delivery targets of the district. Only 37% of the districts housing supply will be provided by allocated site up to 2022. Residential allocations provide the most secure and deliverable sources of swellings yet the council has chosen to rely on undelivered extant planning permissions and windfall sites. The potential for an undersupply of dwellings to occur and the lack of flexibility in the LDP to respond to such an occurrence renders the LDP unsound.

Change To Plan:

Site reference 382, Land adjoining Tyddyn Bach, Penmaenmawr should be allocated for housing.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22539

Representation ID: 22535

OBJECT Penmaenmawr Golf Club (Mr Clive T Brown)

Summary:

We object to the candidate site reference 329.

The area of land was erroneously the subject of an outline planning application by a previous committee of the club. This committee failed to realise the impact of building on this land would have on the ability of the club to continue to play golf on the existing adjoining areas.

The committee failed to take account of the affect any injunction to stop playing golf on the grounds of safety would have on the credibility of the golf course.

This will undermine the financial viability of the club for the future.

Change To Plan:

Do not allocate the candidate site 329 or allow any development on the site.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22535

Representation ID: 22523

OBJECT Abergele Town Council (Mrs Mandy Evans)

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22523

Representation ID: 22461

OBJECT Mr Peter Edmondson

Summary:

I enclose a mpa showing our property, outlined in red, known as the West Coast Factory, Llanfairfechan.

I would be most grateful if you would consider this property for inclusion in the Local Development Plan with regard to future housing development.

Change To Plan:

Include the West Coast Factory, Llanfairfechan as a housing allocation.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22461

Representation ID: 22460

OBJECT Dexter Products (Mr Chris Westmoreland)

Summary:

Please consider the area defined on the enclosed map, at Llanerch Road, Llanfairfechan to be considered for inclusion in the Developmenet Plan as an area for residential development.

The tenant of the garage at the rear of the property is on a rolling 12 month notice to vacate so that will not be a problem.

Change To Plan:

Please consider the area defined on the enclosed map, at Llanerch Road, Llanfairfechan to be considered for inclusion in the Developmenet Plan as an area for residential development.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22460

Representation ID: 22427

OBJECT Natural Resources Wales (Mr Richard Ninnes)

Summary:

How has the capacity of the Tier 1 and 2 villages to accommodate the level of development proposed without significant harm to their character/biodiversity / landscape been decided? Fore.g. at Llysfaen, there is a proposal for an extra 250 houses.

Change To Plan:

How has the capacity of the Tier 1 and 2 villages to accommodate the level of development proposed without significant harm to their character/biodiversity / landscape been decided? Fore.g. at Llysfaen, there is a proposal for an extra 250 houses.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22427

Representation ID: 22389

SUPPORT Denbighshire County Council - Planning Policy (Ms Angela Loftus)

Summary:

The increased level of new housing to be provided over the period 2007 - 2022, in order to meet household forecasts for Conwy, is noted and welcomed. The strategy as to where these new homes should be located is a matter for Conwy CBC.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22389

Representation ID: 22374

OBJECT Mrs Searl represented by Leith Planning Ltd (Mrs Rebecca Booth)

Summary:

Whilst section 3.14.5 advises that Llandudno, Llandudno Junction and Conwy are to provide up to 20540 dwellings, the two sites proposed for development within Llandudno Junction represent just 8% of the provision for the three key towns. This figure is considered to be wholly insufficient to meet the needs of such a major town and particularly with so much employment land focus.

It would be unsustainable to provide lots of employment land without the associated housing development at Llandudno Junction to support the objectives of sustainable development. It is considered that additional housing land should be provided within Llandudno Junction.

Change To Plan:

Additional housing land should be provided within Llandudno Junction. This can be achieved through most effective and efficient use of sites that have already been allocated for development such as Esgyryn.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22374

Representation ID: 22339

OBJECT Welsh Assembly Government (Mr Mark Newey)

Summary:

In total all types of windfall sites are estimated to deliver approximately 30+% of the total provision (2334 dwellings). This degree of reliance on windfalls, introduces a considerable degree of uncertainty with consequences for clarity and ability to deliver infrastructure.

Additionally, the evidence for the continuation of the rate at which windfall sites have come forward in the past needs to be robust, clearly justifying why and how such a trend will continue over the plan period. If this cannot be evidenced it could result in a serious risk to the delivery of the strategy.

Change To Plan:

Policy DP/2 may need to be strengthened to better guide the release of windfall sites in line with the strategy and the proposed monitoring at paragraph 5.1.5.

Whilst policy HOU/1 states the level provision and contingency housing, the policy would be clearer if it were reworded to make clear that the contingency omponent is part of the overall provision to come forward when required, to ensure delivery of the required amount over the plan period.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22339

Representation ID: 22317

OBJECT S J Dell

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22317

Representation ID: 22313

OBJECT T Burton

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22313

Representation ID: 22309

OBJECT H K Irving

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22309

Representation ID: 22305

OBJECT R J Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22305

Representation ID: 22301

OBJECT M Jobson

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22301

Representation ID: 22297

OBJECT Mr Gareth Thomas

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22297

Representation ID: 22293

OBJECT B Stratham

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22293

Representation ID: 22289

OBJECT Ms Sophie Davies

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22289

Representation ID: 22285

OBJECT Ms B E Roberts

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22285

Representation ID: 22281

OBJECT Ms Maureen Lomax

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22281

Representation ID: 22277

OBJECT Mr Archie Owen

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22277

Representation ID: 22273

OBJECT Ms Stella Davis

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22273

Representation ID: 22269

OBJECT R N Parry

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22269

Representation ID: 22265

OBJECT Mr John Hughes

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22265

Representation ID: 22261

OBJECT Mr Iori Davies

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22261

Representation ID: 22257

OBJECT W Colclough

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22257

Representation ID: 22253

OBJECT M Jacklin

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22253

Representation ID: 22249

OBJECT M Barrett

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22249

Representation ID: 22245

OBJECT M Barrett

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22245

Representation ID: 22241

OBJECT Ms Shiela Thomas

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22241

Representation ID: 22237

OBJECT Ms Emma Kewley

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22237

Representation ID: 22233

OBJECT P Williams

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22233

Representation ID: 22229

OBJECT P Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22229

Representation ID: 22225

OBJECT B Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22225

Representation ID: 22221

OBJECT J Murphy

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22221

Representation ID: 22217

OBJECT M C Crowl

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22217

Representation ID: 22213

OBJECT A S Pullin

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22213

Representation ID: 22209

OBJECT Mr Adam Goss

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22209

Representation ID: 22205

OBJECT J Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22205

Representation ID: 22201

OBJECT M Hall

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22201

Representation ID: 22197

OBJECT Ms Ellen Dorricott

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22197

Representation ID: 22193

OBJECT Ms Mandy Pritchard

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22193

Representation ID: 22189

OBJECT H Parry

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22189

Representation ID: 22185

OBJECT Ms Grace Loom

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22185

Representation ID: 22181

OBJECT Ms E Garland

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22181

Representation ID: 22177

OBJECT G Gawer

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22177

Representation ID: 22173

OBJECT G Watson-Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22173

Representation ID: 22169

OBJECT Mrs May Dredge

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22169

Representation ID: 22165

OBJECT G Saunders

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22165

Representation ID: 22161

OBJECT B H Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22161

Representation ID: 22157

OBJECT D H Dorricott

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22157

Representation ID: 22153

OBJECT J Shah

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22153

Representation ID: 22149

OBJECT L V Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22149

Representation ID: 22145

OBJECT Ms Marylyn Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22145

Representation ID: 22141

OBJECT M Howard

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22141

Representation ID: 22137

OBJECT J Barrett

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22137

Representation ID: 22133

OBJECT B Fortune

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22133

Representation ID: 22129

OBJECT A Brown

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22129

Representation ID: 22125

OBJECT L Owen

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22125

Representation ID: 22121

OBJECT R Aughton

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22121

Representation ID: 22117

OBJECT S F Vick

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22117

Representation ID: 22113

OBJECT Ms Lisa Davies

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22113

Representation ID: 22109

OBJECT F Groves

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22109

Representation ID: 22105

OBJECT L Hill

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22105

Representation ID: 22101

OBJECT J A Webster

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22101

Representation ID: 22097

OBJECT L J Cheetham

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22097

Representation ID: 22093

OBJECT Mr William Ivor

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22093

Representation ID: 22089

OBJECT Ms Kelly Taylor

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22089

Representation ID: 22085

OBJECT A Wise

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22085

Representation ID: 22081

OBJECT Ms Joyce Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22081

Representation ID: 22077

OBJECT Ms Joan Burton

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22077

Representation ID: 22073

OBJECT A C Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22073

Representation ID: 22069

OBJECT Ms M E Davies

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22069

Representation ID: 22065

OBJECT Ms Katie Bebbington

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22065

Representation ID: 22061

OBJECT Ms Sue Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22061

Representation ID: 22057

OBJECT D Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22057

Representation ID: 22053

OBJECT J Broadbridge

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22053

Representation ID: 22049

OBJECT Ms Rebecca Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22049

Representation ID: 22045

OBJECT P Roberts

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22045

Representation ID: 22041

OBJECT Mr Gereint Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22041

Representation ID: 22037

OBJECT C Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22037

Representation ID: 22033

OBJECT Mr Brian Roberts

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22033

Representation ID: 22029

OBJECT Mr Colin Cottrell

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22029

Representation ID: 22025

OBJECT T Shelmerdine

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22025

Representation ID: 22021

OBJECT J C James

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22021

Representation ID: 22017

OBJECT M Cox

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22017

Representation ID: 22013

OBJECT Joan Griffiths

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22013

Representation ID: 22009

OBJECT Mr Alan Graham

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22009

Representation ID: 22005

OBJECT Mr Phil Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22005

Representation ID: 22001

OBJECT Mr Peter Carpenter

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 22001

Representation ID: 21997

OBJECT Ms Leslie Evans

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21997

Representation ID: 21993

OBJECT Ms Edna Dunn

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21993

Representation ID: 21989

OBJECT Mrs Anona Sampson

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21989

Representation ID: 21985

OBJECT K Shah

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21985

Representation ID: 21981

OBJECT D Shah

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21981

Representation ID: 21977

OBJECT P Bolderson

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21977

Representation ID: 21973

OBJECT Mr & Mrs C H Baines

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21973

Representation ID: 21969

OBJECT E A Thomas

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21969

Representation ID: 21965

OBJECT Mr John Wilson Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21965

Representation ID: 21961

OBJECT G Howard

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21961

Representation ID: 21957

OBJECT W Howard

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21957

Representation ID: 21953

OBJECT S Todd

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21953

Representation ID: 21949

OBJECT R Atherton

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21949

Representation ID: 21945

OBJECT L Coleman

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21945

Representation ID: 21941

OBJECT Mr Frank Davis

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21941

Representation ID: 21937

OBJECT J O'Leary

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21937

Representation ID: 21933

OBJECT N Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21933

Representation ID: 21929

OBJECT Mr John Bentley

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21929

Representation ID: 21925

OBJECT Mr Mike Hogan

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21925

Representation ID: 21921

OBJECT Ms Jennifer Rowlands

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21921

Representation ID: 21917

OBJECT J Longmore

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21917

Representation ID: 21913

OBJECT Ms Margaret Evans

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21913

Representation ID: 21909

OBJECT Mr Paul Foulkes

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21909

Representation ID: 21905

OBJECT Francis Hogan

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21905

Representation ID: 21901

OBJECT K Williams

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21901

Representation ID: 21897

OBJECT F A Craig

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21897

Representation ID: 21893

OBJECT H E Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21893

Representation ID: 21889

OBJECT P Stubbs

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21889

Representation ID: 21885

OBJECT Ms Hazel Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21885

Representation ID: 21881

OBJECT S Hodgetts

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21881

Representation ID: 21877

OBJECT D G Hughes

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21877

Representation ID: 21873

OBJECT C Truscott

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21873

Representation ID: 21869

OBJECT Ms Tracey Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21869

Representation ID: 21865

OBJECT K Stephenson

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21865

Representation ID: 21861

OBJECT Mr Keith Roberts

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21861

Representation ID: 21857

OBJECT D Hughes

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21857

Representation ID: 21853

OBJECT G Breeze

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21853

Representation ID: 21849

OBJECT B Greenfield

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21849

Representation ID: 21841

OBJECT D Parmintor

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21841

Representation ID: 21837

OBJECT Heddwyn Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21837

Representation ID: 21833

OBJECT R Davies

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21833

Representation ID: 21829

OBJECT A Hughes

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21829

Representation ID: 21825

OBJECT E M Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21825

Representation ID: 21821

OBJECT C Owen

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21821

Representation ID: 21817

OBJECT S Roberts

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21817

Representation ID: 21813

OBJECT S Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21813

Representation ID: 21809

OBJECT K Ellis

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21809

Representation ID: 21805

OBJECT J Pluck

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21805

Representation ID: 21801

OBJECT Mr Martin Hampson

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21801

Representation ID: 21797

OBJECT G J Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21797

Representation ID: 21793

OBJECT B Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21793

Representation ID: 21789

OBJECT Ms Eileen Gallie

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21789

Representation ID: 21785

OBJECT Mr David Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21785

Representation ID: 21781

OBJECT Mr Iwan Hughes

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21781

Representation ID: 21777

OBJECT Mr Ben Baker

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21777

Representation ID: 21773

OBJECT Ms Lynne Owen

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21773

Representation ID: 21769

OBJECT Mr Nigel Owen

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21769

Representation ID: 21765

OBJECT H Burton

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21765

Representation ID: 21761

OBJECT Ms Kate Lindley

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21761

Representation ID: 21757

OBJECT Ms Jean Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21757

Representation ID: 21753

OBJECT Ms Michelle Harrison

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21753

Representation ID: 21749

OBJECT The Occupier

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21749

Representation ID: 21745

OBJECT Mr Neil Collison

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21745

Representation ID: 21741

OBJECT B Drury

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21741

Representation ID: 21737

OBJECT Ms Julie Caffari

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21737

Representation ID: 21733

OBJECT Ms Hollie Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21733

Representation ID: 21729

OBJECT Ms Dilys Carlisle

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21729

Representation ID: 21725

OBJECT Mr Steven Roberts

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21725

Representation ID: 21721

OBJECT Ms Jayne Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21721

Representation ID: 21717

OBJECT Mr Stephen Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21717

Representation ID: 21713

OBJECT M Bartlett

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21713

Representation ID: 21709

OBJECT C Owen

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21709

Representation ID: 21705

OBJECT Mr Mark Stafford

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21705

Representation ID: 21701

OBJECT Ms Joyce Stafford

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21701

Representation ID: 21697

OBJECT Mrs Sarah Ward

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21697

Representation ID: 21693

OBJECT Mr Michael Gregson

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21693

Representation ID: 21689

OBJECT A Atherton

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21689

Representation ID: 21685

OBJECT Mr Alan Dugdale

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21685

Representation ID: 21681

OBJECT Mr R R Griffiths

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21681

Representation ID: 21677

OBJECT Ms Lesley Heatley

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21677

Representation ID: 21673

OBJECT Mr Gareth Owen

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21673

Representation ID: 21669

OBJECT Mr Gwynfor Davies

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21669

Representation ID: 21665

OBJECT S Pritchard

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21665

Representation ID: 21661

OBJECT Mr Dave Kesteven

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21661

Representation ID: 21657

OBJECT Mrs Margaret Williams

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21657

Representation ID: 21653

OBJECT Ms A Owen

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21653

Representation ID: 21649

OBJECT Ms Edna Austin

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21649

Representation ID: 21645

OBJECT Mr John Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21645

Representation ID: 21641

OBJECT Mr Paul McCormack

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21641

Representation ID: 21637

OBJECT Eirwyn Davies

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21637

Representation ID: 21633

OBJECT Mr Peter Roberts

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21633

Representation ID: 21629

OBJECT Mr Paul Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21629

Representation ID: 21625

OBJECT Mr Medwyn Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21625

Representation ID: 21621

OBJECT Mr Gareth Williams

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21621

Representation ID: 21617

OBJECT Ms Anne Oliver

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21617

Representation ID: 21613

OBJECT Ms Beryl Pearson

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21613

Representation ID: 21609

OBJECT Mr John Brook

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21609

Representation ID: 21605

OBJECT J Williams

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21605

Representation ID: 21601

OBJECT G Roberts

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21601

Representation ID: 21597

OBJECT Ms Bethan Coleman

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21597

Representation ID: 21593

OBJECT V E David

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21593

Representation ID: 21589

OBJECT Ms Patricia Day

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21589

Representation ID: 21585

OBJECT Ms Sarah Roberts

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21585

Representation ID: 21581

OBJECT Mr William Wooton

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21581

Representation ID: 21577

OBJECT Mrs Carole Grant

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21577

Representation ID: 21573

OBJECT Major D Grant

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21573

Representation ID: 21569

OBJECT G B Thomas

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21569

Representation ID: 21565

OBJECT Mr Hadyn Thomas

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21565

Representation ID: 21561

OBJECT Ms Nicola Thomas

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21561

Representation ID: 21557

OBJECT Mr & Mrs Ian & Rosemary Boulton

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21557

Representation ID: 21553

OBJECT T Hopkinson

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21553

Representation ID: 21549

OBJECT G Berrow

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21549

Representation ID: 21545

OBJECT V J Coffey

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21545

Representation ID: 21541

OBJECT Ms Maureen Thomas

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21541

Representation ID: 21537

OBJECT Mr Rhys Winters-Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21537

Representation ID: 21533

OBJECT Mrs Sharon Winters-Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21533

Representation ID: 21529

OBJECT Ms Averil Bentley

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21529

Representation ID: 21525

OBJECT Ms Mary Armstrong

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21525

Representation ID: 21521

OBJECT T Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21521

Representation ID: 21517

OBJECT T M Knight

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21517

Representation ID: 21513

OBJECT M R Harris

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21513

Representation ID: 21509

OBJECT N Williams

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21509

Representation ID: 21505

OBJECT Viv Healy

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21505

Representation ID: 21501

OBJECT Ms Joan Mynott

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21501

Representation ID: 21493

OBJECT Ms Donna Foulkes

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21493

Representation ID: 21489

OBJECT R Dell

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21489

Representation ID: 21485

OBJECT D M Healy

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21485

Representation ID: 21481

OBJECT Ms Fran Ashdown

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21481

Representation ID: 21477

OBJECT Ms Yvonne Leggett

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21477

Representation ID: 21473

OBJECT Mr Carl Hancock

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21473

Representation ID: 21469

OBJECT Mr/Ms Townsend

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21469

Representation ID: 21465

OBJECT J Hall

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21465

Representation ID: 21461

OBJECT I A Craig

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21461

Representation ID: 21457

OBJECT Mr Eddie Newall

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21457

Representation ID: 21453

OBJECT H J Smith

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21453

Representation ID: 21449

OBJECT R Williams

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21449

Representation ID: 21445

OBJECT Ms Kate Rowlands

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21445

Representation ID: 21441

OBJECT S Connor

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21441

Representation ID: 21437

OBJECT Ms Anne Evans

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21437

Representation ID: 21433

OBJECT Mr Dave Williams

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21433

Representation ID: 21429

OBJECT Ms Olwen M Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21429

Representation ID: 21425

OBJECT B Owen

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21425

Representation ID: 21421

OBJECT Dr Rowland

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21421

Representation ID: 21417

OBJECT D Gawer

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21417

Representation ID: 21413

OBJECT Ms Phyllis Roberts

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21413

Representation ID: 21409

OBJECT Mr Shaun Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21409

Representation ID: 21405

OBJECT Mr Dave Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21405

Representation ID: 21401

OBJECT Ms Sue Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21401

Representation ID: 21397

OBJECT M Lunt

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21397

Representation ID: 21393

OBJECT P Stephenson

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21393

Representation ID: 21389

OBJECT Mr Rob Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21389

Representation ID: 21385

OBJECT S Hughes

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21385

Representation ID: 21381

OBJECT J M Roberts

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21381

Representation ID: 21377

OBJECT Mr Barry Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21377

Representation ID: 21373

OBJECT E Webster

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21373

Representation ID: 21369

OBJECT K Ellis

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21369

Representation ID: 21365

OBJECT J Collier

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21365

Representation ID: 21361

OBJECT E Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21361

Representation ID: 21357

OBJECT G Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21357

Representation ID: 21353

OBJECT M Batchford

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21353

Representation ID: 21349

OBJECT CDR G G Croft

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21349

Representation ID: 21345

OBJECT Ms Sheila Probin

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21345

Representation ID: 21341

OBJECT Mr Glyn Hughes

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21341

Representation ID: 21337

OBJECT Mr Stuart Kewley

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21337

Representation ID: 21333

OBJECT C Duce

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21333

Representation ID: 21329

OBJECT P Seddon

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21329

Representation ID: 21325

OBJECT D Moody

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21325

Representation ID: 21321

OBJECT Ms Susan Gibbs

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21321

Representation ID: 21317

OBJECT E D Gollop

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21317

Representation ID: 21313

OBJECT Mr Paul Stafford

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21313

Representation ID: 21309

OBJECT Ms Sandra Stafford

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21309

Representation ID: 21305

OBJECT Pat Helm

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21305

Representation ID: 21301

OBJECT Sam Roberts

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21301

Representation ID: 21297

OBJECT Ms Josie Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21297

Representation ID: 21293

OBJECT Ms Hazel Brown

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21293

Representation ID: 21289

OBJECT Ms Joan Truby

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21289

Representation ID: 21285

OBJECT Ms Diane Cattell

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21285

Representation ID: 21281

OBJECT E MacGregor

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21281

Representation ID: 21277

OBJECT A Butterworth

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21277

Representation ID: 21273

OBJECT K Carlisle

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21273

Representation ID: 21269

OBJECT T Evans

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21269

Representation ID: 21265

OBJECT J Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21265

Representation ID: 21261

OBJECT L Evans

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21261

Representation ID: 21257

OBJECT Ms Roxy Roberts

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21257

Representation ID: 21253

OBJECT R O Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21253

Representation ID: 21249

OBJECT L J Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21249

Representation ID: 21245

OBJECT Pat Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21245

Representation ID: 21241

OBJECT Mrs D M Rahil

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21241

Representation ID: 21237

OBJECT B M Smith

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21237

Representation ID: 21233

OBJECT K Smithyman

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21233

Representation ID: 21229

OBJECT J L Smith

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21229

Representation ID: 21225

OBJECT J Aucher

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21225

Representation ID: 21221

OBJECT H Evans

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21221

Representation ID: 21217

OBJECT L Brookes-Fazakerley

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21217

Representation ID: 21213

OBJECT Mr Craig Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21213

Representation ID: 21209

OBJECT Ms Trudy Roberts

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21209

Representation ID: 21205

OBJECT Mr Tony Hughes

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21205

Representation ID: 21201

OBJECT M E Hughes

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21201

Representation ID: 21197

OBJECT Ms Anita Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21197

Representation ID: 21193

OBJECT D Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21193

Representation ID: 21189

OBJECT Mr Stephen Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21189

Representation ID: 21185

OBJECT C Roberts

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21185

Representation ID: 21181

OBJECT D Coulson

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21181

Representation ID: 21177

OBJECT H Coulson

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21177

Representation ID: 21173

OBJECT Mr Kevin Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21173

Representation ID: 21169

OBJECT M E Cutts

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21169

Representation ID: 21165

OBJECT M A Powell

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21165

Representation ID: 21161

OBJECT R Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21161

Representation ID: 21153

OBJECT E Holmes

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21153

Representation ID: 21149

OBJECT E Johnson

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21149

Representation ID: 21145

OBJECT J Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21145

Representation ID: 21141

OBJECT M Walls

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21141

Representation ID: 21137

OBJECT S Walls

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21137

Representation ID: 21133

OBJECT N Walls

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21133

Representation ID: 21129

OBJECT C Walls

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21129

Representation ID: 21125

OBJECT P Walls

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21125

Representation ID: 21121

OBJECT L Brookes

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21121

Representation ID: 21113

OBJECT E Parmintor

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21113

Representation ID: 21109

OBJECT D A Gay

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21109

Representation ID: 21105

OBJECT A McKereder

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21105

Representation ID: 21101

OBJECT Ms Delyth Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21101

Representation ID: 21097

OBJECT L Hughes

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21097

Representation ID: 21093

OBJECT S Woods

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21093

Representation ID: 21089

OBJECT M Vaughan

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21089

Representation ID: 21085

OBJECT A Owen

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21085

Representation ID: 21081

OBJECT A L Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21081

Representation ID: 21077

OBJECT S Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21077

Representation ID: 21073

OBJECT Glan Conwy Preservation Group (Mr Daniel Worsley)

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21073

Representation ID: 21069

OBJECT G Bench

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21069

Representation ID: 21065

OBJECT P McGregor

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21065

Representation ID: 21061

OBJECT D McGregor

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21061

Representation ID: 21057

OBJECT Mr A Bligh

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21057

Representation ID: 21053

OBJECT Ms Gemma Baker

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21053

Representation ID: 21049

OBJECT Ms Karen Baker

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21049

Representation ID: 21045

OBJECT Mr Paul Baker

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21045

Representation ID: 21041

OBJECT Ms Lucy Hughes

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21041

Representation ID: 21033

OBJECT Mr Alfie Roberts

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21033

Representation ID: 21029

OBJECT Ms Jodi Gallimore

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21029

Representation ID: 21025

OBJECT Mr Jason Stock

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21025

Representation ID: 21021

OBJECT Mr Zak Owen

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21021

Representation ID: 21017

OBJECT Ms Helen Hughes

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21017

Representation ID: 21013

OBJECT M Bligh

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21013

Representation ID: 21009

OBJECT Ms Bryony Banwell

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21009

Representation ID: 21005

OBJECT Ms P M Williams

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21005

Representation ID: 21001

OBJECT A Griffiths

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 21001

Representation ID: 20997

OBJECT P Brown

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20997

Representation ID: 20993

OBJECT N Goss

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20993

Representation ID: 20989

OBJECT Ms Christine Brown

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20989

Representation ID: 20985

OBJECT T Traynor

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20985

Representation ID: 20981

OBJECT Zoe Parry

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20981

Representation ID: 20977

OBJECT Mr Lee Hogan

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20977

Representation ID: 20973

OBJECT Lou Caffari

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20973

Representation ID: 20969

OBJECT C M Goss

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20969

Representation ID: 20965

OBJECT Mr Howard Manwaring

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20965

Representation ID: 20961

OBJECT F Roberts

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20961

Representation ID: 20957

OBJECT Ms Rebecca Scarlett

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20957

Representation ID: 20953

OBJECT Ms Hilda Green

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20953

Representation ID: 20949

OBJECT L Swainson

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20949

Representation ID: 20945

OBJECT H M Clarke

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20945

Representation ID: 20941

OBJECT Mr Berwyn Davies

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20941

Representation ID: 20937

OBJECT Ms Joyce Rowson

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20937

Representation ID: 20933

OBJECT N Griffiths

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20933

Representation ID: 20929

OBJECT Ms Maureen Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20929

Representation ID: 20925

OBJECT Ms Jackie Roberts

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20925

Representation ID: 20921

OBJECT Ms Anne Forsberg

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20921

Representation ID: 20917

OBJECT Ms Lesley Cockings

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20917

Representation ID: 20913

OBJECT Mrs Slater

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20913

Representation ID: 20909

OBJECT Ms Joanne Graham

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20909

Representation ID: 20905

OBJECT Ms Cheryl Kesteven

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20905

Representation ID: 20901

OBJECT Ms Shiela Brady

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20901

Representation ID: 20897

OBJECT Ms Sharon Harrison

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20897

Representation ID: 20893

OBJECT Mrs Paddy Williams

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20893

Representation ID: 20889

OBJECT M Young

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20889

Representation ID: 20885

OBJECT N G Evans

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20885

Representation ID: 20881

OBJECT Mr James Northrop

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20881

Representation ID: 20877

OBJECT Mr Alan Mumby

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20877

Representation ID: 20873

OBJECT Mr Iain Mumby

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20873

Representation ID: 20869

OBJECT Gwynty Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20869

Representation ID: 20865

OBJECT Mr Mike Oliver

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20865

Representation ID: 20861

OBJECT B Williams

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20861

Representation ID: 20857

OBJECT Ms Pam Staley

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20857

Representation ID: 20853

OBJECT Ms Margaret A Phillips

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20853

Representation ID: 20849

OBJECT Ms Hazel Old

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20849

Representation ID: 20845

OBJECT Y Stanworth

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20845

Representation ID: 20841

OBJECT M Stanworth

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20841

Representation ID: 20837

OBJECT L Webster

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20837

Representation ID: 20833

OBJECT Ms Shannon Drury

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20833

Representation ID: 20829

OBJECT A Armstrong

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20829

Representation ID: 20825

OBJECT Ms Tesni Thomas

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20825

Representation ID: 20821

OBJECT R J Davies

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20821

Representation ID: 20817

OBJECT Mr Lee D Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20817

Representation ID: 20813

OBJECT A B Malone

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20813

Representation ID: 20809

OBJECT Mr Hywel Hughes

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20809

Representation ID: 20805

OBJECT A Williams

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20805

Representation ID: 20801

OBJECT A Williams

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20801

Representation ID: 20797

OBJECT Mr David Livings

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20797

Representation ID: 20793

OBJECT D Williams

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20793

Representation ID: 20789

OBJECT A Roberts

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20789

Representation ID: 20785

OBJECT J Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20785

Representation ID: 20781

OBJECT S Hender

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20781

Representation ID: 20777

OBJECT N Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20777

Representation ID: 20773

OBJECT Mr Roy Gill

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20773

Representation ID: 20769

OBJECT N Taylor

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20769

Representation ID: 20765

OBJECT Mr Edward Gareth Williams

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20765

Representation ID: 20761

OBJECT Ms O Williams

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20761

Representation ID: 20757

OBJECT Mr Ifan P Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20757

Representation ID: 20753

OBJECT R N Millner

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20753

Representation ID: 20749

OBJECT Mr Wayne Harris

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20749

Representation ID: 20745

OBJECT Ms G Garland

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20745

Representation ID: 20741

OBJECT B Thomas

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20741

Representation ID: 20737

OBJECT Mr Peter Thomas

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20737

Representation ID: 20733

OBJECT R Searle

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20733

Representation ID: 20729

OBJECT J Craddock Jnr

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20729

Representation ID: 20725

OBJECT J Craddock

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20725

Representation ID: 20721

OBJECT Mr Andy Parry

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20721

Representation ID: 20717

OBJECT Mr Phil Ward

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20717

Representation ID: 20713

OBJECT Mrs Denise Cattell

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20713

Representation ID: 20709

OBJECT Mr Jon Cattell

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20709

Representation ID: 20705

OBJECT Ms Sarah Shea

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20705

Representation ID: 20701

OBJECT Ms Jill Hughes

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20701

Representation ID: 20697

OBJECT L M Armstrong

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20697

Representation ID: 20693

OBJECT F Roberts

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20693

Representation ID: 20689

OBJECT A Searle

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20689

Representation ID: 20685

OBJECT Mrs J Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20685

Representation ID: 20681

OBJECT Mr Kevin O'Leary

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20681

Representation ID: 20677

OBJECT Anwen O'Leary

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20677

Representation ID: 20673

OBJECT Ms Jean Johnson

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20673

Representation ID: 20669

OBJECT A R Ormes

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20669

Representation ID: 20665

OBJECT Ms Dilys Roberts

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20665

Representation ID: 20661

OBJECT Ms Ellen Millington

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20661

Representation ID: 20657

OBJECT Mrs Enid Williams

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20657

Representation ID: 20653

OBJECT Mr John Williams

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20653

Representation ID: 20649

OBJECT Ms Lisa Hogan

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20649

Representation ID: 20645

OBJECT Mr Mike Williams

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20645

Representation ID: 20641

OBJECT Mr Ian Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20641

Representation ID: 20637

OBJECT Ms Jennie Gairns

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20637

Representation ID: 20633

OBJECT Mr Andrew Gairns

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20633

Representation ID: 20629

OBJECT Lam Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20629

Representation ID: 20625

OBJECT B Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20625

Representation ID: 20621

OBJECT S Swainson

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20621

Representation ID: 20617

OBJECT P Prouse

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20617

Representation ID: 20613

OBJECT Ms D Butler

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20613

Representation ID: 20609

OBJECT K McGrane

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20609

Representation ID: 20605

OBJECT K Coleman

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20605

Representation ID: 20601

OBJECT J Barrett

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20601

Representation ID: 20597

OBJECT Ms Hannah Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20597

Representation ID: 20593

OBJECT Ms Alison Newell

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20593

Representation ID: 20589

OBJECT Mr Brad Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20589

Representation ID: 20585

OBJECT Ms Charlotte Davies

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20585

Representation ID: 20581

OBJECT Ms Elane Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20581

Representation ID: 20577

OBJECT A R Williams

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20577

Representation ID: 20573

OBJECT Mr Paul Owen

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20573

Representation ID: 20569

OBJECT Mrs & Mrs J & W Ward

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20569

Representation ID: 20565

OBJECT Mr & Mrs Roger Garland

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20565

Representation ID: 20561

OBJECT Mr & Mrs K & S Prior

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20561

Representation ID: 20557

OBJECT Ms Linda Hughes

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20557

Representation ID: 20553

OBJECT Mr Brandon Moody

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20553

Representation ID: 20549

OBJECT Mr James Lewis

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20549

Representation ID: 20545

OBJECT Mr Derek Hughes

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20545

Representation ID: 20541

OBJECT Hannah .

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20541

Representation ID: 20537

OBJECT Mr Jack Burton

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20537

Representation ID: 20533

OBJECT D Drury

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20533

Representation ID: 20529

OBJECT T Foley

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20529

Representation ID: 20525

OBJECT Mr S Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20525

Representation ID: 20521

OBJECT L Beddows

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20521

Representation ID: 20517

OBJECT Mr Colin Brown

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20517

Representation ID: 20513

OBJECT Ms Caroline Benjamin

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20513

Representation ID: 20509

OBJECT M Benjamin

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20509

Representation ID: 20505

OBJECT R K Benjamin

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20505

Representation ID: 20501

OBJECT H G Taylor

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20501

Representation ID: 20497

OBJECT Cllr Frank Bradfield

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20497

Representation ID: 20493

OBJECT Mr Robert Patterson

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20493

Representation ID: 20489

OBJECT Mr David Dredge

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20489

Representation ID: 20485

OBJECT Ms Gwyneth Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20485

Representation ID: 20481

OBJECT Mr John Davies

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20481

Representation ID: 20477

OBJECT Ms Anne Penketh

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20477

Representation ID: 20473

OBJECT Mr Stephen Evans

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20473

Representation ID: 20469

OBJECT Mrs Elaine Brook

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20469

Representation ID: 20465

OBJECT C Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20465

Representation ID: 20461

OBJECT R Smith

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20461

Representation ID: 20457

OBJECT N Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20457

Representation ID: 20453

OBJECT D Roberts

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20453

Representation ID: 20449

OBJECT D Armstrong

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20449

Representation ID: 20445

OBJECT Ms Susan Lewis

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20445

Representation ID: 20441

OBJECT R Hughes

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20441

Representation ID: 20437

OBJECT Ms Jan Roberts

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20437

Representation ID: 20433

OBJECT Ms Nia Lloyd

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20433

Representation ID: 20429

OBJECT M Williams

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20429

Representation ID: 20425

OBJECT A Hughes

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20425

Representation ID: 20421

OBJECT Mr Colin MacKenzie

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20421

Representation ID: 20417

OBJECT A Webb

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20417

Representation ID: 20413

OBJECT J Webb

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20413

Representation ID: 20409

OBJECT N Edwards

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20409

Representation ID: 20405

OBJECT Mr Dennis Booth

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20405

Representation ID: 20401

OBJECT Ms Brenda Roberts

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20401

Representation ID: 20397

OBJECT Ms Kelly Camis

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20397

Representation ID: 20393

OBJECT Mr James Camis

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20393

Representation ID: 20389

OBJECT Ms Melanie Manwaring

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20389

Representation ID: 20385

OBJECT Mr Phil Griffiths

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20385

Representation ID: 20381

OBJECT Chris Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20381

Representation ID: 20377

OBJECT Mr Alun Williams

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20377

Representation ID: 20373

OBJECT Mr Ian Sampson

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20373

Representation ID: 20369

OBJECT S Shah

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20369

Representation ID: 20365

OBJECT Mr Dennis Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20365

Representation ID: 20361

OBJECT T Barrett

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20361

Representation ID: 20357

OBJECT S Todd

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20357

Representation ID: 20353

OBJECT DA Berrow

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20353

Representation ID: 20349

OBJECT D Berrow

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20349

Representation ID: 20345

OBJECT C Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20345

Representation ID: 20341

OBJECT J S Neward

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20341

Representation ID: 20337

OBJECT Mr/Ms Neward

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20337

Representation ID: 20333

OBJECT Mr David Newall

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20333

Representation ID: 20329

OBJECT Mr Ian Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20329

Representation ID: 20325

OBJECT H L Harris

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20325

Representation ID: 20321

OBJECT A Longmore

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20321

Representation ID: 20317

OBJECT R Davies

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20317

Representation ID: 20313

OBJECT Ms Lindsay Beecham

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20313

Representation ID: 20309

OBJECT Mr Nick Lewis

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20309

Representation ID: 20305

OBJECT Mr Eryl Williams

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20305

Representation ID: 20301

OBJECT M Outram

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20301

Representation ID: 20297

OBJECT B Walding

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20297

Representation ID: 20293

OBJECT Ms Claire Hughes

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20293

Representation ID: 20289

OBJECT Mr Alwyn Evans

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20289

Representation ID: 20285

OBJECT Les Evans

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20285

Representation ID: 20281

OBJECT Ms Ann Roberts

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20281

Representation ID: 20277

OBJECT P Roberts

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20277

Representation ID: 20273

OBJECT C Woodcock

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20273

Representation ID: 20269

OBJECT K Hunt

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20269

Representation ID: 20265

OBJECT Mr Derek Carlisle

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20265

Representation ID: 20261

OBJECT P Lewis

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20261

Representation ID: 20257

OBJECT G East

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20257

Representation ID: 20253

OBJECT R Pinkerton

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20253

Representation ID: 20249

OBJECT C S F Daw

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20249

Representation ID: 20245

OBJECT Mr Brian Griffiths

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20245

Representation ID: 20241

OBJECT Ms Jenny Roberts

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20241

Representation ID: 20237

OBJECT Mr Glyn Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20237

Representation ID: 20233

OBJECT Mr Ben Liepins

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20233

Representation ID: 20229

OBJECT Mr Malcolm Bleasdale

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20229

Representation ID: 20225

OBJECT Mrs Louise Rahil-Kirwin

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20225

Representation ID: 20221

OBJECT Dr H Rahil

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20221

Representation ID: 20217

OBJECT Ms Emma Barrett

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20217

Representation ID: 20213

OBJECT J Roberts

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20213

Representation ID: 20209

OBJECT R Goosey

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20209

Representation ID: 20205

OBJECT S Roberts

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20205

Representation ID: 20201

OBJECT M Baldwin

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20201

Representation ID: 20197

OBJECT S Barrett

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20197

Representation ID: 20193

OBJECT Ms Sheila Johnston

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20193

Representation ID: 20189

OBJECT Mr William Heatley

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20189

Representation ID: 20185

OBJECT Mrs Lisa Lewis

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20185

Representation ID: 20181

OBJECT Mr Dave Parry

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20181

Representation ID: 20177

OBJECT Ms Sue Hancock

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20177

Representation ID: 20173

OBJECT Ms Ceris Phillips

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20173

Representation ID: 20169

OBJECT Mrs Lorraine Patterson

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20169

Representation ID: 20165

OBJECT Ms Lindsay Marchant

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20165

Representation ID: 20161

OBJECT Mr Stephan Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20161

Representation ID: 20157

OBJECT S Williams

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20157

Representation ID: 20153

OBJECT Ms Fay Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20153

Representation ID: 20149

OBJECT Mr Kevin Bird

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20149

Representation ID: 20145

OBJECT Ms Joan Halliday

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20145

Representation ID: 20141

OBJECT Mr Rolfe Lomas

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20141

Representation ID: 20137

OBJECT B Lomas

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20137

Representation ID: 20133

OBJECT Ms Alma Gill

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20133

Representation ID: 20129

OBJECT Mrs Jean Owen

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20129

Representation ID: 20125

OBJECT Mr Robert Owen

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20125

Representation ID: 20121

OBJECT Mr Edward H Williams

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20121

Representation ID: 20117

OBJECT D Cope

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20117

Representation ID: 20113

OBJECT Mr Arwyn Roberts

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20113

Representation ID: 20109

OBJECT Ms Pauline Williams

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20109

Representation ID: 20105

OBJECT V Hamilton-Shields

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20105

Representation ID: 20101

OBJECT Ms Jennifer Heys

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20101

Representation ID: 20097

OBJECT Mr David Neil Roberts

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20097

Representation ID: 20093

OBJECT Mr Gwyn Roberts

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20093

Representation ID: 20089

OBJECT M E Griffiths

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20089

Representation ID: 20085

OBJECT Ms Jade Davies

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20085

Representation ID: 20081

OBJECT Ms Liz MacKenzie

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20081

Representation ID: 20077

OBJECT Mrs Maura Livings

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20077

Representation ID: 20073

OBJECT Mr David Kirwin

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20073

Representation ID: 20069

OBJECT Ms Edwina Rahil

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20069

Representation ID: 20065

OBJECT Ms Aimee Rahil

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20065

Representation ID: 20061

OBJECT Ms Michelle Stephens

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20061

Representation ID: 20057

OBJECT Mr Simon Rahil

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20057

Representation ID: 20053

OBJECT Ms Hazel Rahil

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20053

Representation ID: 20049

OBJECT Ms Loren Edwards

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20049

Representation ID: 20045

OBJECT Ms Jade Kristian

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20045

Representation ID: 20041

OBJECT Mr Joshua Alex Sanders

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20041

Representation ID: 20037

OBJECT Mr Anthony Howard

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20037

Representation ID: 20034

OBJECT M & AC Marsden & Bellow

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20034

Representation ID: 20033

OBJECT Ms Sandra Allen

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20033

Representation ID: 20031

OBJECT Ms Mary Halliwell

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20031

Representation ID: 20029

OBJECT Ms Lynda Bleasdale

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20029

Representation ID: 20026

OBJECT Cllr Gail Hall

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58,329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20026

Representation ID: 20025

OBJECT Mr Darrell Owens

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20025

Representation ID: 20023

OBJECT Ms Hilary Moore

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20023

Representation ID: 20018

OBJECT Ms Diane Roberts

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20018

Representation ID: 20014

OBJECT Mr J P Lamb

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20014

Representation ID: 20013

OBJECT Mrs Carys Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20013

Representation ID: 20010

OBJECT Miss P Watson-Jones

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20010

Representation ID: 20003

OBJECT Mr David Forrest

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 20003

Representation ID: 19999

OBJECT Mr Gerry McCaffrey

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Raising the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and represent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19999

Representation ID: 19995

OBJECT Cllr Anne McCaffrey

Summary:

I object to the identification in principle as opportunities for housing sites 58, 329 and 330, using prime farmland/recreational land for c30 houses either as windfall sites or as rural exception sites.

Rasing the profile of these sites, whilst keeping them under the radar, flags to developers the willingness of CC to develop them.

These sites are Landscape Conservation Areas in the Gwynedd Structure Plan, Green Barriers in Conwy UDP and respresent development outside the settlement area. They are prime agricultural land and constitute a loss of existing greenfield land.

There is no evidence of housing need in this settlement.

Change To Plan:

Delete sites 58, 329 and 330


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19995

Representation ID: 19983

OBJECT Mrs Elizabeth Gaynor Wade

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19983

Representation ID: 19975

OBJECT Mr Thomas Ronald Wade

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19975

Representation ID: 19966

OBJECT Mrs Eileen Mary Simpson

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19966

Representation ID: 19955

OBJECT Ms Nesta Mary Davies

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19955

Representation ID: 19946

OBJECT Mr Eurwyn E Rowlands

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19946

Representation ID: 19937

OBJECT Mrs Menna Wyn Rowlands

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19937

Representation ID: 19927

OBJECT Mrs Carys Irene Williams

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19927

Representation ID: 19919

OBJECT Mr David Bryan Jones

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19919

Representation ID: 19910

OBJECT Mrs Brenda Williams

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19910

Representation ID: 19901

OBJECT Mr Tegwyn Williams

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19901

Representation ID: 19891

OBJECT Mr Eurwyn Davies

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19891

Representation ID: 19882

OBJECT Mrs Hazel Cannell

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19882

Representation ID: 19873

OBJECT Mr Arthur Rodney Cannell

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19873

Representation ID: 19864

OBJECT Mr Stephen Branwood

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19864

Representation ID: 19855

OBJECT Miss J Pendlebury

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19855

Representation ID: 19846

OBJECT Mr David Holmes

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19846

Representation ID: 19837

OBJECT Miss Stephanie Taylor

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19837

Representation ID: 19828

OBJECT Ms Lesley Taylor

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19828

Representation ID: 19819

OBJECT Mr Geoffrey Peter Simpson

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19819

Representation ID: 19810

OBJECT Mrs Glenda Holmes

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19810

Representation ID: 19800

OBJECT Mrs Barbara Ocego

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19800

Representation ID: 19791

OBJECT Miss Charlotte Louise Schofield

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19791

Representation ID: 19783

OBJECT Mrs Doreen Murphy

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19783

Representation ID: 19775

OBJECT Ms Dora Sumner

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19775

Representation ID: 19767

OBJECT Mrs K Tavernor

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19767

Representation ID: 19761

OBJECT Mr Dennis Holden

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19761

Representation ID: 19753

OBJECT Mr John I McGrory

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19753

Representation ID: 19745

OBJECT Mrs Sylvia Lousie Edwards

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19745

Representation ID: 19737

OBJECT Mrs Gwerfyl Owen Davies

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19737

Representation ID: 19729

OBJECT Mr Cledwyn Davies

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19729

Representation ID: 19723

OBJECT Mrs Valerie Ellison

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19723

Representation ID: 19715

OBJECT Mrs Angela Whitney

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19715

Representation ID: 19709

OBJECT Mrs Norah Patricia Roberts

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19709

Representation ID: 19703

OBJECT Mrs Ann Vaughan

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19703

Representation ID: 19690

OBJECT Mrs Brenda Holden

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19690

Representation ID: 19682

OBJECT Mr Christopher Robin Ocego

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19682

Representation ID: 19675

OBJECT Mrs Beatrice Zena Powney

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19675

Representation ID: 19667

OBJECT Mr Graham Ellison

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19667

Representation ID: 19659

OBJECT Mr Richard Thomas Byron Wade

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19659

Representation ID: 19652

OBJECT Mrs Christine Muriel McAlpine

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19652

Representation ID: 19640

OBJECT Mr Ron Edwards

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19640

Representation ID: 19638

OBJECT Mrs Gillian Rutherford

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19638

Representation ID: 19626

OBJECT Mrs Pauline Schofield

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19626

Representation ID: 19617

OBJECT Mrs Judith Walker

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19617

Representation ID: 19608

OBJECT Mr Kenneth Walker

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19608

Representation ID: 19599

OBJECT Miss Pat Roberts

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19599

Representation ID: 19590

OBJECT Mr Gavin Lavington

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19590

Representation ID: 19580

OBJECT Ms Ann May Andrews

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19580

Representation ID: 19579

OBJECT Menter Iaith Conwy (Mr Meirion Davies)

Summary:

Datblygiadau Niwediol

Fel "cynllunwyr ieithyddol" proffesiynol credwn fod 2 achos fydd yn cael effaith sylweddol negyddol ar y Gymraeg fel iaith gymunedol.

Llanrwst

Datblygu 150 o dai yn Llanrwst. Gan fod y "teclyn" ond newydd gael ei fabwysiadu.

Abergele

Rydym hefyd yn arbennig o bryderus am ddatblygu 873 o dai yn ardal Abergele. Er bod Abergele tu hwnt i ardal sydd wedi ei ddinodi yn "ardal ieithyddol sensitive". Credwn bydd y datblygiad yma yn gwanhau y Gymraeg ym mhellach ac yn cael effaith negyddol ar ardaloedd agos megis Llanfairtalhearn.

Change To Plan:

Credwn buasai parhau efo'r cynlluniau yma yn mynd yn groes i Strategaeth Gymunedol y sir sydd yn datgan;

"Hunaniaeth Gymdeithasol a Diwylliannol - mae trigolion Bwrdeistref Sirol Conwy yn falch o'u diwylliant ac yn frwd dros barhau i warchod a datblygu'r Gymraeg." Tud 9.


We believe that continuing with these schemes would be contrary to the county's Community Strategy that states;

"Social and Cultural Identity - the residents of Conwy County Borough are proud of their culture and are keen to continue preserving and developing the Welsh language." Page 9.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19579

Representation ID: 19573

OBJECT Cyngor Cymuned Llangernyw (Mrs Elwen Owen)

Summary:

Mae Cyngor Cymuned Llangernyw yn bryderus am y nifer o dai ychwanegol y gellir eu hadeiladu yn y sir ac yn arbennig y nifer sydd wedi ei glustnodi ar gyfer Abergele.

Gofynnwn y cwestiwn a oes gan y Cyngor Bwrdeistref Sirol ddigon o adnoddau i gynnal y boblogaeth fydd yn dod yn sgil y datblygiadau tai?

Ond ar y llaw arall rydym yn awyddus i bentrefi bach fod yn bentrefi byw - ac nid yn llawn o bobl mewn oed - ac rydym yn falch y bydd modd i godi tai fforddiadwy yn y pentrefi os oes galwad lleol.

Change To Plan:

Reduce housing growth.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19573

Representation ID: 19572

OBJECT Mr & Mrs T & M Williams

Summary:

Cawson ein brawychu a'n siomi pan glywsom fod Sir Conwy yn bwriadu adeiladu miloedd o dai yn Sir Conwy yn eu Cynllun Datblygu LLeol.

Dymunwn fynegi ein ngwrthwynebiad llwyraf i'r bwriad hwn ar sail y rhesymau a ganlyn:
* Mae maintioli'r datblygiad yn gwbl afresymol.
* Byddai adeiladu cynifer a hyn o dai yn rhoi straen afresymol ar yr isadeiledd lleol.
* Nid yw'r datblygiad yn gwneud unrhyw synnwyr o safbwynt amgylcheddol.
* Bydd y datblygiad yn rhwym o achosi newid demograffig sylweddol ac yn sicr o ddod a newidiadau diwylliannol enfawr yn ei sgil.

Change To Plan:

Reduce housing growth.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19572

Representation ID: 19567

OBJECT Mr and Mrs David Gee

Summary:

Our previous objections and observations still stand.

We consider the 2011 edition unsound because:

1. It still only specifies 6800 new housing units with 9600 required by the previous UK government.
2. Although a contingency level of up to 7900 units is mentioned it is far from clear where the additional 1100 units would be located.
3. It appears some contingency is in Kinmel Bay with a high flood risk.
4. 325 dwellings are to be found by means of the Empty Homes Strategy - this seems unreaslistic and unsound.

Change To Plan:

The LDP would be improved if some of the land between Hawes Drive and Maes-y-Castell were designated as suitable for residential development.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19567

Representation ID: 19557

SUPPORT Castell Development Limited represented by GVA (Mr Stephen Bell)

Summary:

Castell Developments supports the strategic housing target of approximately 6,800 new dwellings and the contingency level of up to approximately 7,900 dwellings.
It supports the approach of locating approximately 85% of new dwellings within the Urban Development Strategy Area.
It supports the approach of locating significant levels of new housing in Abergele.
It welcomes the recognition in Table 4 that windfall development will play an important role in delivering the required levels of new housing.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19557

Representation ID: 19546

OBJECT Mr Gary Bernard Whitney

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19546

Representation ID: 19537

OBJECT Mrs Wendy Bainbridge

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19537

Representation ID: 19529

OBJECT Mr Alastair Bainbridge

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19529

Representation ID: 19527

OBJECT Mr Adrian Lloyd Jones

Summary:

The level of new build required within the LDP is far more than that which is actually required for the County Borough taking into account past population changes and likely future scenarios.

The levels of new build houses proposed for Dwygyfylchi and Penmaenmawr are excesive to that which is actually required. Whilst some new houses may well be needed, the numbers being proposed are too great for such a small village.

Change To Plan:

Reduce the housing allocation within the LDP.
Reduce the housing allocation for Dwygyfylchi and Penmaenmawr.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19527

Representation ID: 19519

OBJECT Miss Ydwen Davies

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19519

Representation ID: 19511

OBJECT Mr Mark Bond

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19511

Representation ID: 19503

OBJECT Mr David Adams

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19503

Representation ID: 19495

OBJECT Mrs Helga A Adams

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19495

Representation ID: 19486

OBJECT Mr & Mrs Wennell represented by Mr Mark Roberts

Summary:

Site 223 has failed the Stage 2 Site Assessment, we feel however that the site has merit and we would wish it to be put forard for consideration as a contingency site.

My clients propose if needed to include the whole of their existing curtilage within the site to be considered for candidacy or as an alternative to that which they have already proposed. They propose to demolish their exisitng dwelling if successful and their existing access could be used in either case.

Change To Plan:

Site 223 to be considered as a contingency site


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19486

Representation ID: 19485

OBJECT Mr David Schofield

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19485

Representation ID: 19483

SUPPORT Landmark Consultancy (Mr David Collins)

Summary:

I fully support all of your allocations, which I feel reflect the fairness of distribution to meet the future needs within the existing communities. I also fully support the mechanism of new allocations and additional, reserve allocations scheduled under the contingency arrangements.

I am aware of the adverse comments from interested pressure groups and those with vested interests but I feel that, as an Authority, the approach you have taken is commendable.

I would urge Members to look to the future and ignore the short term "nimby" approach that so many objectors are driven by.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19483

Representation ID: 19474

OBJECT Dr Aram Baghomian

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19474

Representation ID: 19473

OBJECT Mrs Julia Brownsword

Summary:

Include candidate site references 363 and 364 in the LDP.

Change To Plan:

Include candidate site references 363 and 364 in the LDP.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19473

Representation ID: 19463

OBJECT Mr Crispin Lems Jones

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19463

Representation ID: 19462

OBJECT Mrs Crenydd Cox represented by Hamon Design Ltd (Mr Rodney Hamon)

Summary:


The settlement boundary line in Llanfairfechan has been relocated in the proposed draft LDP maps, excluding an area of land between Tyddyn Bedol and Tyddyn Bedol Isaf which is viable for potential infill development.

This relocation of the settlement boundary was carried out without consultation with the land ownerr and the local councillor, both of whom wish the area to remain within the settlement boundary.

The settlement boundary in the draft UDP included this area of land.

Change To Plan:

Re locate the settlement boundary at Llanfairfechan to include the area of land between Tyddyn Bedol Isaf and Tyddyn Bedol to allow it to be used for infill development.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19462

Representation ID: 19445

OBJECT Mrs Gloria Garner

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19445

Representation ID: 19444

OBJECT Cyngor Cymuned Llansannan (Mr Eifion Jones)

Summary:

We are aware that the areas of land submitted for the Local Development Plan during March 2007 have either been withdrawn by their owners or deemed unsuitable by the Planning Service.

This is of grave concern to us as a Council and we ask you to re-consider these sites once more as we need affordable housing in this village to ensure future growth.

Change To Plan:

Re-consider the sites submitted in Llansannan during March 2007.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19444

Representation ID: 19435

OBJECT Mr Ronald Garner

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19435

Representation ID: 19426

OBJECT Mr John Fowler

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19426

Representation ID: 19417

OBJECT Mr Geoffrey Hatcher

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19417

Representation ID: 19407

OBJECT Mr Wiggett

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19407

Representation ID: 19399

OBJECT Mrs Timmins

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19399

Representation ID: 19386

OBJECT Mr Richard Waters

Summary:

Abergele Area

The allocation of 870 dwellings is excessive. The exisitng commitments/windfall sites have been understated by at least 100 dwellings. More could be done to reduce the number of empty dwellings.

Reasons for objection:
1. Welsh language and culture
a. Sustainability
b. Conflict with national policy
c. Conflict with the Spatial Plan
d. Conflict with the Community Strategy
e. Monitoring

2. Loss of outstanding countryside
3. Transport problems

Change To Plan:

Revise the housing growth level for Abergele.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19386

Representation ID: 19384

OBJECT Mrs Gwenda Pugh

Summary:

I would like to appeal against the decision not to include the site at Cwm Eithin, Cerrigydrudion in the LDP. We feel the decision may have been based on old plans showing the entrance to be narrower than it actually is.

Change To Plan:

Allocate the site at Cwn Eithin, Cerrig y Drudion for housing.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19384

Representation ID: 19383

OBJECT David Clayton Associates (Mr David Clayton MCIAT ACIOB)

Summary:

We enclose a location plan showing a 1.2 acre site in the village of Tyn-y-Groes.

We understand that there is a need in the areas of Tyn-y-Groes, Dolgarrog and Eglwysbach for modestly priced housing and housing adapted for disable use. We wish to register our interest in developing the identified land for these or similar uses.

The site received outline planning consent some years ago for a total of 16 dwellings.

Change To Plan:

Allocate the site in Tyn-y-Groes for housing.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19383

Representation ID: 19382

OBJECT Mr E R Davies

Summary:

I propose that condidate stie 109 should be reconsidered for partial small scale development for residential pruposed e.g. Affordable Housing.

I do not consider the rasons stated in the LDP for it not being taken forward are sound:
a) The top part of the site are not on a slope for building exclusion.
b) The access road is exactly the same as for site 454 which was deemed acceptable.

Change To Plan:

The settlement boundary should be modified to include all or part of site 109.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19382

Representation ID: 19370

OBJECT Mr Leonard Lees

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19370

Representation ID: 19363

OBJECT Mrs Janet Margaret Taylor

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19363

Representation ID: 19356

OBJECT Mrs Gwyneth Mary Leech

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19356

Representation ID: 19347

OBJECT Mr David Mortimer Jones

Summary:

I would like to amend site 164(SR44) North of Lark Hill, Sychnant Pass Road to propose a smaller site reduced from 2.635 to 1.8 hectares.

I believe that the relative lack of allocated sites within easy reach of the town of Conwy does constiture an element of inflexibility which is likely to become noticeable long before 2022.

No significant objection has been raised to this site. Although the site falls wtihin the World Heritage Site no part of the site is visible from any part of the World Hertiage Site itself including the town walls of Conwy or Conwy Castle.

Change To Plan:

Allocate site 164(SR44) North of Lark Hill, Sychnant Pass Road for housing with a revised site plan in essence a smaller site reduced from 2.635 hectares to 1.8 hectares.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19347

Representation ID: 19346

OBJECT Mr Peter W Osborn

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19346

Representation ID: 19337

OBJECT Miss Andrea C Osborn

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19337

Representation ID: 19328

OBJECT Mrs Gaenor Jones Baghomian

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19328

Representation ID: 19318

OBJECT Mrs Susan C Osborn

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19318

Representation ID: 19316

OBJECT Mrs Lorna Jones

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19316

Representation ID: 19313

OBJECT Mr Alun Gwyn Jones

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19313

Representation ID: 19312

OBJECT CEMEX UK Operations Ltd represented by Drivers Jones LLP (Mr Philip Grant)

Summary:

A significant and potentially unfeasible proportion of development identified to come forward is expected to arise from windfall sites.

We would question the ability of ensuring the effective delivery of sustainable market housing sites in windfall locations in line with identified need.

The allocation of a greater number of suitable, deliverable and available sites for housing in sites currently outside of, yet immediately adjacent to the development limits would provide a more sound approach towards ensuring sustainable future housing delivery.

The site at Raynes Quarry is considered to provide such an opportunity.

Change To Plan:

Allocate the site at Raynes Quarry for housing.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19312

Representation ID: 19302

OBJECT Mrs Pamela Cavalier Waitecross

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19302

Representation ID: 19290

OBJECT Mr Peter Faulkner

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19290

Representation ID: 19287

OBJECT Broadbridge Bros. (Ms Done) represented by Mr Mark Roberts

Summary:

My client requests that the site at Bryn Lupus Road, Llanrhos be allocated for residential development in the Local Development Plan.

Change To Plan:

The site at Bryn Lupus Road, Llanrhos be allocated for residential development.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19287

Representation ID: 19280

OBJECT Ms Joyce Faulkner

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19280

Representation ID: 19279

OBJECT Muller Austin Ltd represented by Cadnant Planning (Mr Rhys Davies BA (Hons) MRTPI)

Summary:

It is considered that it would be sustainable to include the former Billington's Garage site, Conwy within the development boundary for Conwy.

Including the site within the boundary would permit the redevelopment of this previously developed land in line with the objectives of Planing Policy Wales and would also capitalize on regeneration opportunities for the Conwy/Llandudno and Llandudno Junction hub in line with the objectives of the Wales Spatial Plan.

Change To Plan:

Include the former Billington's Garage site within the development boundary for Conwy.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19279

Representation ID: 19273

OBJECT Miss Jennifer Evans

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19273

Representation ID: 19267

OBJECT Mr Eirwen Jones

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19267

Representation ID: 19260

OBJECT Mr Ian McAlpine

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19260

Representation ID: 19249

OBJECT Mr Cliff Cox

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19249

Representation ID: 19248

OBJECT Mr Ted Botfield represented by Cadnant Planning (Mr Rhys Davies BA (Hons) MRTPI)

Summary:

It is considered that the site offered by this representation should be allocated for residential development in the Conwy LDP and also deleted from the Green Wedge designation which covers the Old Cowlyn Golf Course.

Change To Plan:

Remove the land on the south east side of Coed Coch Road, Old Colwyn from the Green Wedge and allocate for housing.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19248

Representation ID: 19222

OBJECT Ms Mary Jamil

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19222

Representation ID: 19213

OBJECT Mrs Irene Cook

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19213

Representation ID: 19204

OBJECT Mrs Barbara Howarth

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19204

Representation ID: 19193

OBJECT Mr Christopher Howarth

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19193

Representation ID: 19192

OBJECT Cartrefi Conwy represented by C B Richard Ellis (Ms Bernadette McQuillan)

Summary:

We are proposing the allocation of a site at land at Maes y Llan, Groesfordd, Dwygyfylchi.

Change To Plan:

We are proposing the allocation of a site at land at Maes y Llan, Groesfordd, Dwygyfylchi.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19192

Representation ID: 19191

OBJECT Cartrefi Conwy represented by C B Richard Ellis (Ms Bernadette McQuillan)

Summary:

We are proposing the allocation of a site at land off Berth y Glyd Road, Llysfaen.

Change To Plan:

We are proposing the allocation of a site at land off Berth y Glyd Road, Llysfaen.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19191

Representation ID: 19190

OBJECT Cartrefi Conwy represented by C B Richard Ellis (Ms Bernadette McQuillan)

Summary:

We are proposing the allocation of a site at land off Llysfaen Road, Llysfaen.

Change To Plan:

We are proposing the allocation of a site at land off Llysfaen Road, Llysfaen.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19190

Representation ID: 19189

OBJECT Cartrefi Conwy represented by C B Richard Ellis (Ms Bernadette McQuillan)

Summary:

We are proposing the allocation of a site at land off Cae Tyddyn, Llanrwst.

Change To Plan:

We are proposing the allocation of a site at land off Cae Tyddyn, Llanrwst.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19189

Representation ID: 19188

OBJECT Cartrefi Conwy represented by C B Richard Ellis (Ms Bernadette McQuillan)

Summary:

We are proposing the allocation of a site at land off Tan Y Fron, Deganwy.

Change To Plan:

We are proposing the allocation of a site at land off Tan Y Fron, Deganwy.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19188

Representation ID: 19187

OBJECT Cartrefi Conwy represented by C B Richard Ellis (Ms Bernadette McQuillan)

Summary:

We are proposing the allocation of a site at land to the rear of Hendy Tal y Bont.

Change To Plan:

We are proposing the allocation of a site at land to the rear of Hendy Tal y Bont.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19187

Representation ID: 19186

OBJECT Cartrefi Conwy represented by C B Richard Ellis (Ms Bernadette McQuillan)

Summary:

Policy HOU/1 is too prescriptive in the delivery of both open market and affordable housing. The policy is inflexible and the prescriptive nature, particulalry with regard to the delivery of affordable housing, is not realistic given the recent economic downturn and the overall fall in the delivery of housing and affordable housing.

Again the first paragraph on page 111 is inflexible and restricts the provision of affordable housing. This paragraph restricts the delivery of AHLN to within the confinements of the settlement.

Change To Plan:

The text above criteria (b), on page 109, should be amended at the end of the first sentence to include additional text as follows "...or where there is a need for additional housing within the locality".

The first sentence of the paragraph regarding Tier 1 and Tier 2 Main Villages on page 110 should include the following additional text "...except where demand for market housing can be demonstrated". The reference to "small-scale schemes" within this paragraph is inflexible as the size of schemes for AHLN should not be limited to a specifc size but should respond to the requirements of the individual area.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19186

Representation ID: 19180

OBJECT Beech Developments (NW) Ltd (Mr Mike Roberts) represented by Goodwin Planning Services Ltd (Mr Stephen Goodwin)

Summary:

Objection to the land opposite Pinewood Stables, Sychnanat Pass Road not being allocated.

The Council has previuosly assessed the suitability of the site for housing and considered it as suitable for development.

The site is highly accessible to jobs, shops, services, school etc by means other than car.

There is a shortfall of housing land allocated ini the Plan. The allocation of the site will assist in meeting this shortfall in what is a highly sustainable and accessible location.

Change To Plan:

The site know as land opposite Pinweood Stables, Sychnant Pass Road be allocated for housing purposes.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19180

Representation ID: 19177

OBJECT Macbryde Homes Ltd represented by Goodwin Planning Services Ltd (Mr Stephen Goodwin)

Summary:

We have made separate representations in relation to the housing land supply, needs and levels of growth suggest in the Plan. The conclusion of these representations is that without additional housing provision the plan is unsound and there is a considerable shortfall in housing land supply to meet the needs identified by the evidence.

The allocation of the site at Peulwys Farm, Peulwys Lane, Old Colwyn will address this.

Change To Plan:

The allocation of the site at Peulwys Farm, Peulwys Lane, Old Colwyn


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19177

Representation ID: 19176

OBJECT Macbryde Homes Ltd represented by Goodwin Planning Services Ltd (Mr Stephen Goodwin)

Summary:

The Council's figures of between 5500 and 6800 dwelling over the plan period are unrealistically low, will not deliver required levels of open market or affordable housing and will result in a decline in labour force to the detreiment of the economic prosperity of the County.

Change To Plan:

Part 1 of Policy HOU/1 should be amended to read:

Over the period 2007/2022, CCBC will plan, monitor and review the delivery of 7900 new dwellings (an average annual rate of 527 new dwellings) inclusive of completions, commitments, windfalls and new allocations and a contingency level of up to approximately 9000 dwellings (1,100 dwellings).


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19176

Representation ID: 19168

OBJECT Redrow (Ms Victoria Murray) represented by Capita Symonds (Mr Huw Evans)

Summary:

The Policy fails to meet an appropriate level of housing land supply. This is due to inadequate housing land allocation provision compunded by an unrealistic and inappropriate assumption regarding the density to be applied to new development.

Change To Plan:

Additional housing land allocation should be made.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19168

Representation ID: 19167

OBJECT Redrow (Ms Victoria Murray) represented by Capita Symonds (Mr Huw Evans)

Summary:

In order to meeet a more realistic housing target for the settlement of Abergele including Town and Kinmel Bay the land identilfied on the attached plan should be allocated for residential use with provision for a link road linking allocated sites to the north and south west.

It will assist in addressing the affordable housing requirement and will enable the provision of infrastrucutre that is necessary to meet the highways requirements of the sites allocated within the plan.

The site will assist in matching housing and employment land provision.

Change To Plan:

Allocate the site on the attached plan for housing.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19167

Representation ID: 19158

OBJECT J Clarkson

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19158

Representation ID: 19147

OBJECT D C Clarkson

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19147

Representation ID: 19136

OBJECT C Royds

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19136

Representation ID: 19125

OBJECT B Royds

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19125

Representation ID: 19114

OBJECT J Mitchell

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19114

Representation ID: 19103

OBJECT S Jones-Roberts

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19103

Representation ID: 19092

OBJECT Mrs Doreen E Tracey

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19092

Representation ID: 19081

OBJECT Mr H Tracey

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19081

Representation ID: 19070

OBJECT A Lloyd Roberts

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19070

Representation ID: 19059

OBJECT Mrs Sharron Claire Tinsley

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19059

Representation ID: 19048

OBJECT Mr Barry Keith Davies

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19048

Representation ID: 19037

OBJECT Mr Gwilym Price Owen

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19037

Representation ID: 19026

OBJECT Mr Gareth Hughes

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19026

Representation ID: 19015

OBJECT Mrs Judith Ann Hughes

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19015

Representation ID: 19004

OBJECT Mr Lewis Jones

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 19004

Representation ID: 18993

OBJECT Miss Ann Lea Hughes

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18993

Representation ID: 18982

OBJECT Mrs E Evans

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18982

Representation ID: 18971

OBJECT Miss M E Hughes

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18971

Representation ID: 18960

OBJECT Mrs Jennifer Ann Davies

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18960

Representation ID: 18949

OBJECT Mr I Hughes

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18949

Representation ID: 18938

OBJECT Mrs Sian Gaynor Elizabeth Brennan

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18938

Representation ID: 18927

OBJECT Mrs Beryl Horseman

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18927

Representation ID: 18916

OBJECT Mr David Rhys Evans

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18916

Representation ID: 18905

OBJECT Mrs Edna Harrison

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18905

Representation ID: 18894

OBJECT Mrs Gwyneth Price Davies

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18894

Representation ID: 18883

OBJECT Mr Geraint Wyn Williams

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18883

Representation ID: 18872

OBJECT Mrs Michele Williams

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18872

Representation ID: 18861

OBJECT Mr Clive Dawson Williams

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18861

Representation ID: 18850

OBJECT Mrs Pamela Elizabeth Williams

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18850

Representation ID: 18839

OBJECT Mr E Leahy

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18839

Representation ID: 18828

OBJECT Mrs Margaret MaClenan

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18828

Representation ID: 18817

OBJECT Mrs Margaret Kenyon

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18817

Representation ID: 18806

OBJECT Miss Sharon Marie Kregar

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18806

Representation ID: 18795

OBJECT Mrs Pearl Roberts

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18795

Representation ID: 18784

OBJECT Mr Dennis Charles Roberts

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18784

Representation ID: 18773

OBJECT Mrs Margaret Mary Davies

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18773

Representation ID: 18762

OBJECT Mrs M Cowburn

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18762

Representation ID: 18751

OBJECT Mrs Mona Morris

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18751

Representation ID: 18740

OBJECT Mrs Alison Humphries

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18740

Representation ID: 18729

OBJECT Cllr Samuel Rowlands

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18729

Representation ID: 18718

OBJECT Mr & Mrs Williams

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18718

Representation ID: 18707

OBJECT Mrs Patricia Thorpe

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18707

Representation ID: 18696

OBJECT Mr Barry Thorpe

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18696

Representation ID: 18685

OBJECT Mr Raymond Halliday

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18685

Representation ID: 18674

OBJECT Mr Daniel Tinsley

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18674

Representation ID: 18663

OBJECT Mr Graham Tinsley

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18663

Representation ID: 18652

OBJECT Mr John Raymond Stuart Gunning

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18652

Representation ID: 18641

OBJECT Mrs Valerie Irene Gunning

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18641

Representation ID: 18630

OBJECT Mrs Susan D Jones

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18630

Representation ID: 18619

OBJECT Mr Reginald Harrison

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18619

Representation ID: 18608

OBJECT Mrs Gwendolyn Davies

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18608

Representation ID: 18597

OBJECT Mr & Mrs Peter Jones

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18597

Representation ID: 18586

OBJECT Mrs Jean Tomlinson

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18586

Representation ID: 18575

OBJECT Ms Christine Ryder

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18575

Representation ID: 18564

OBJECT Mrs Jean Jones

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18564

Representation ID: 18553

OBJECT Mr Dewi Wyn Jones

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18553

Representation ID: 18542

OBJECT Mr Dennis Stephen

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18542

Representation ID: 18531

OBJECT Mr Dewi Jones

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18531

Representation ID: 18520

OBJECT Mrs Glenys Elizabeth Fall

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18520

Representation ID: 18509

OBJECT M Evans

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18509

Representation ID: 18498

OBJECT Mr Dylan Wyn Davies

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18498

Representation ID: 18487

OBJECT Mrs Margaret Glenys Davies

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18487

Representation ID: 18476

OBJECT Mrs Grace Margaret Jones

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18476

Representation ID: 18465

OBJECT Mrs Margaret Watson

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18465

Representation ID: 18454

OBJECT Mr Eric Watson

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18454

Representation ID: 18443

OBJECT Mrs Anwen Medlicott

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18443

Representation ID: 18432

OBJECT Mrs Nia Evans

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18432

Representation ID: 18421

OBJECT Mrs Rhiannon Lally

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18421

Representation ID: 18410

OBJECT Mrs Karen Beck

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18410

Representation ID: 18399

OBJECT D Woodhouse

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18399

Representation ID: 18388

OBJECT Mr Kenneth John Sudlow

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18388

Representation ID: 18377

OBJECT Mrs Jeanette Leech

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18377

Representation ID: 18366

OBJECT Mr Gordon Leech

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18366

Representation ID: 18355

OBJECT Mr David Geraint Mark Davies

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18355

Representation ID: 18344

OBJECT Mr Donald Short

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18344

Representation ID: 18333

OBJECT Mrs Marjorie Short

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18333

Representation ID: 18322

OBJECT Mr Allan Frederick Nicholls

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18322

Representation ID: 18311

OBJECT Mrs Jacqueline Ann Nicholls

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18311

Representation ID: 18300

OBJECT Mr Harry Thompson

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18300

Representation ID: 18289

OBJECT Mrs Carrie Thompson

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18289

Representation ID: 18278

OBJECT Miss Dawn Alison Poole

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18278

Representation ID: 18267

OBJECT Mr Leslie Samuel Evans

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18267

Representation ID: 18256

OBJECT Mrs Joan Wayre

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18256

Representation ID: 18245

OBJECT Mr Michael Joseph John's

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18245

Representation ID: 18234

OBJECT Mr Peter Woodhouse

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18234

Representation ID: 18223

OBJECT Mrs Monica Jones

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18223

Representation ID: 18212

OBJECT Mrs Davida Wooller

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18212

Representation ID: 18201

OBJECT Mr Phillip Lally

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18201

Representation ID: 18190

OBJECT Mr Roheryn Evans

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18190

Representation ID: 18179

OBJECT Mr James William Fall

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18179

Representation ID: 18168

OBJECT Mr Norman Cook

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18168

Representation ID: 18157

OBJECT Mr Adam Judge

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18157

Representation ID: 18146

OBJECT Mrs Irene Farrend

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18146

Representation ID: 18135

OBJECT Mr Martin John Kay

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18135

Representation ID: 18124

OBJECT Mr David Underwood Ferrand

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18124

Representation ID: 18113

OBJECT Miss Nia Haf Davies

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18113

Representation ID: 18102

OBJECT Mr Brian C Roberts

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18102

Representation ID: 18091

OBJECT Mr Frederick John Powney

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18091

Representation ID: 18080

OBJECT Cll Jean Stubbs

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18080

Representation ID: 18069

OBJECT Mrs Glenys Kay

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18069

Representation ID: 18058

OBJECT Mrs Margaret Jean Williams

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18058

Representation ID: 18047

OBJECT Mrs Janet Williams

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18047

Representation ID: 18036

OBJECT Mr Cyril Jones

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18036

Representation ID: 18025

OBJECT Mr Michael Halligan

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18025

Representation ID: 18014

OBJECT Mrs T K Ralph

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18014

Representation ID: 18003

OBJECT Mr Stuart Lawson

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 18003

Representation ID: 17992

OBJECT Mrs E J Evans

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17992

Representation ID: 17981

OBJECT Mr D Smith

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17981

Representation ID: 17970

OBJECT J Halliday

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17970

Representation ID: 17959

OBJECT G Rothwell

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17959

Representation ID: 17948

OBJECT M Rothwell

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17948

Representation ID: 17937

OBJECT Mrs Linda Halligan

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17937

Representation ID: 17930

OBJECT Joan Hughes

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17930

Representation ID: 17919

OBJECT William Wells

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17919

Representation ID: 17908

OBJECT Mrs Jennifer Davies

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17908

Representation ID: 17897

OBJECT Mr John Maclennan

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17897

Representation ID: 17886

OBJECT Mrs Elisabeth Brealey

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17886

Representation ID: 17875

OBJECT Mrs Julie Jones

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17875

Representation ID: 17864

OBJECT Mr David Jones

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17864

Representation ID: 17853

OBJECT Mr Tudor Hugh Morris Jones

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17853

Representation ID: 17842

OBJECT Mrs Pauline M Edwards

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17842

Representation ID: 17831

OBJECT Mrs Elisabeth Wynne Parry

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17831

Representation ID: 17820

OBJECT Mr Brian Jones

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17820

Representation ID: 17809

OBJECT Mr Terence Parkin

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17809

Representation ID: 17798

OBJECT Mrs Margaret Parkin

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17798

Representation ID: 17787

OBJECT Miss Roxanne Rebecca Taylor

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17787

Representation ID: 17776

OBJECT Mrs Jean Selina West

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17776

Representation ID: 17765

OBJECT Mr Frederick West

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17765

Representation ID: 17754

OBJECT Rev Donald Postles

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17754

Representation ID: 17743

OBJECT Mrs Audrey Postles

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17743

Representation ID: 17732

OBJECT Mr Colin Masters

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17732

Representation ID: 17721

OBJECT Mr Howard George Oliver

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17721

Representation ID: 17710

OBJECT Miss Lynette Jane Oliver Jones

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17710

Representation ID: 17699

OBJECT Mrs Patricia Morris Jones

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17699

Representation ID: 17688

OBJECT Mr Arfon Hughes

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17688

Representation ID: 17677

OBJECT Mr Eifion T Parry

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17677

Representation ID: 17655

OBJECT Mr Caledfryn Williams

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17655

Representation ID: 17644

OBJECT Mr William Bryan Tomlinson

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17644

Representation ID: 17634

OBJECT Mr Liam Jones

Summary:

Include candidate site 435 within the plan.

This site has been previously assessed however it was removed due to highway officers concerns regarding the network and capacity problems. The existing highway problems in the village are caused by illegal parking and as such could be resolved by robust action by the relevant authorities. A traffic assessment has been carried out and is attached.

The site could be completed in phases with suitable highway improvement works or following relocation of the school from the centre of the village. The site is deliverable in the short term with access from Gorwel Estate.

Change To Plan:

Allocate site 435 for housing.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17634

Representation ID: 17632

OBJECT P & W Broilers Ltd (Mr Rikki Proffitt) represented by Gordon Kenyon (Kenyon & Company) (Mr Gordon Kenyon)

Summary:

Our client objects to omission of land to the south of Gwellyn Avenue, Kinmel Bay from the Strategic Policy HOU/1. Our client considers that the land should continue to be included as an allocation for housing development and should therefore be listed as a proposed housing allocation for Kinmel Bay for the provision of approximately 135 dwellings.

Change To Plan:

Alocate the land south of Gwellyn Avenue, Kinmel Bay for housing.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17632

Representation ID: 17630

OBJECT P & W Broilers Ltd (Mr Rikki Proffitt) represented by Gordon Kenyon (Kenyon & Company) (Mr Gordon Kenyon)

Summary:

Our client objects to revision of the settlement boundary in vicinity of our clients land holdings at Gwellyn Avenue, Kinmel Bay. Our cleint considers that the settletment boundary should remain as previously proposed and follow the line of the River Gele which adjoins our clients ownership to the south.

Change To Plan:

The settletment boundary should remain as previously proposed and follow the line of the River Gele which adjoins our clients ownership to the south.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17630

Representation ID: 17629

OBJECT P & W Broilers Ltd (Mr Rikki Proffitt) represented by Gordon Kenyon (Kenyon & Company) (Mr Gordon Kenyon)

Summary:

Our client objects to deletion of the allocation of land at Gwellyn Avenue, Kinmel Bay for housing development. Our client considers that the land should continue to be included as an allocation for housing development.

Change To Plan:

Reallocate the land at Gwellyn Avenue, Kinmel Bay for housing.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17629

Representation ID: 17627

OBJECT Mr Gwyn Jones represented by Gordon Kenyon (Kenyon & Company) (Mr Gordon Kenyon)

Summary:

Ou client continues to object to the Plan on the basis that land at Towyn Way West has not been allocated for residenetial or other development and that the settlement boundary has not been appropriately amended.
Whilst the site is situated within a flood risk zone, it is considered that the risk and consequences of flooding are likely to be accepetable and manageable.
the land in part comprises previously developed land and is situated immediately adjacent to the settlement boundary.

Change To Plan:

Allocate the land at Town Way West for residential or other development.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17627

Representation ID: 17626

OBJECT Mr Selwyn Rees represented by Owen Devenport Ltd (Mr Berwyn Owen)

Summary:

Site 67/643/353 should be considered separately from the larger Greenfield site to the south, as it is a Brownfield site that forms part of/directly adjoins the settlement & is entirely appropriate for a modest housing development.

The site at Glyn Farm is an entirely acceptable and appropriate site for allocation within the LDP, and does not suffer from the access issues identified by the LPA, and is a suitable Brownfield site for a modest housing development. It should be allocated to assist in meeting the shortfalls in housing growth level set within the Plan.

Change To Plan:

Allocate site 67/643/353 for housing.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17626

Representation ID: 17622

OBJECT O Jones and Sons Ltd (Mr Gareth Jones) represented by Owen Devenport Ltd (Mr Berwyn Owen)

Summary:

Allocate site 149/SR49.
The site is entirely acceptable and appropriate for allocation, it does not suffer from any highway issues. As such is should be allocated to assist in meeting the shorstfalls in housing growth level set within the plan.

Change To Plan:

Allocate site 149/SR49.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17622

Representation ID: 17617

OBJECT Mrs Joan Lees

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17617

Representation ID: 17613

OBJECT The Representative Body of the Church in Wales represented by Jones Peckover (Mr Roger Wilyman)

Summary:

The land being glebe land adjacent to the former Llanddulas Rectory should be allocated for housing.
The proposed site is close to the centre of Llanddulas with local store, primary school, public house, post office, parish Church and community centre.
The site is served by public transport with a regular bus service being on the main bus route betwen Abergele and Colwyn Bay.
The site is a short distance from the North Wales coastal cycle path and is within easy walking distance to the main settlement centre.
We are not aware of any significant environmental considerations.

Change To Plan:

The land being glebe land adjacent to the former Llanddulas Rectory should be allocated for housing.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17613

Representation ID: 17607

OBJECT AM/AC Darren Millar

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language.

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17607

Representation ID: 17606

OBJECT Mrs Janet Davies represented by Jones Peckover (Mr Roger Wilyman)

Summary:

The land forming part of Gwern Tyno Farm should be allocated for housing.

The proposed site would form a logical extension of the existing development in Upper Colwyn Bay. Within the exisitng development there is a local store, primary school, public house and restaurant and community centre.

The site is served by public transport with a bus service and there are no significant environmental considerations.

Change To Plan:

Allocate land forming part of Gwern Tyno Farm for housing.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17606

Representation ID: 17605

OBJECT Mr H V Griffith represented by Cadnant Planning (Mr Rhys Davies BA (Hons) MRTPI)

Summary:

Site reference 260 Fron Ganol, School Bank Road, Llanrwst should be allocated for housing.
The site is suitable for allocation as it is located in an accessible and sustainable location, in close proximity to the local services as well as close to employment opportunities. The site can make a valued contribution to the deliverability of the Council's LDP strategy as well as comply with the aims of PPW in terms of housing delivery and promoting sustainble and accessible forms of development.

Change To Plan:

Allocate site reference 260 Fron Ganol, School Bank Road, Llanrwst for housing.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 17605

Representation ID: 14545

OBJECT Mr David Jones represented by Cadnant Planning (Mr Rhys Davies BA (Hons) MRTPI)

Summary:

The development boundary for Llysfaen should be extended to include the submitted site as it will allow for further substantial housing growth in Llysfaen.
Extending the settlement limit to include the site would fit in with the existing settlement pattern and would effectively round off the existing settlement limit.
The area of land includes land which contains a significant cluster of houses. Redefining the green wedge to exclude this cluster of housing will provide stronger defensible boundaries to the green wedge.
The land is immediately available for development, is appropriate for residential development and in a sustainable location.

Change To Plan:

Allocate the land to the south of Rockhaven, Llysfaen for housing.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 14545

Representation ID: 14544

OBJECT Mr David Jones represented by Cadnant Planning (Mr Rhys Davies BA (Hons) MRTPI)

Summary:

The development boundary for Llysfaen should be extended to include the submitted site as it will allow for further substantial housing growth in Llysfaen.
Extending the settlement limit to include the site would fit in with the existing settlement pattern and would effectively round off the existing settlement limit.
The land is immediately available for development, is appropriate for residential development and in a sustainable location.

Change To Plan:

Allocate the Residential Curtilage of Rhianfa, Llysfaen for housing.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 14544

Representation ID: 14543

OBJECT Mr David Jones represented by Cadnant Planning (Mr Rhys Davies BA (Hons) MRTPI)

Summary:

The development boundary for Llysfaen should be extended to include the submitted site as it will allow for further substantial housing growth in Llysfaen.
Extending the settlement limit to include the site would fit in with the existing settlement pattern and would effectively round off the existing settlement limit.
The area of land includes land which contains a significant cluster of houses. Redefining the green wedge to exclude this cluster of housing will provide stronger defensible boundaries to the green wedge.
The land is immediately available for development, is appropriate for residential development and in a sustainable location.

Change To Plan:

Include land to the West of Rhianfa, Llysfaen for housing.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 14543

Representation ID: 14535

OBJECT Chattelle Developments Ltd (Mr Willie Donnelly) represented by Owen Devenport Ltd (Mr Berwyn Owen)

Summary:

Site 201/C15/SR60 was discounted during the site Assessment Process as it was condered unsuitable for allcation as it was within the Quarry Buffer Zone, Greenwedge and Safeguarded Hard Rock Reserve area set within the LDP proposals maps.
However, bearing in mind the submissions put forward in the Landscape and Visual Impact Appraisal attached and in Sections 2, 4 and 5 in the main submission documenet relating to the Green Wedge designation, the safeguarded Hard Rock reserve Area designation and the Quarry Buffer Zone it is apparent that this assessment is not correct.

Change To Plan:

Allocate site 201/C15/SR60 for housing.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 14535

Representation ID: 14506

OBJECT Mr Gary Jones

Summary:

I object to the ludicrous plans to build around 7,000 new houses all over Conwy county's green spaces.

Roads will become over congested, which will probably lead to the need to plough money into eventually redeveloping them, or maybe residents will be left to struggle through the traffic. Either way, pollution will increase. There is a danger that the classrooms in local schools will become overcrowded, as will the waiting rooms in local doctors and dental surgeries.

Change To Plan:

Reduce the housing growth.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 14506

Representation ID: 14505

OBJECT Mr Robert Malcolm Medlicott

Summary:

We consider the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has or is capable of delivering the necessary infrastructure and house building capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh language).

Change To Plan:

Greater emphasis should be placed on a lower level of growth that supports existing community infrastructure and natural population change.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 14505

Representation ID: 14502

OBJECT Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board represented by The Planning Consultancy (Mr Matt Gilbert)

Summary:

We note that this Policy assumes a contribution towards housing land supply from windfall sites, but at the same time the policy proposes to severely restrict residential development in Tier 2 Main Villages, Minor Villages and elsewhere in hamlets and open countryside. There does not appear to be any policy in the Plan which makes clear the intended approach to previously developed sites which arise as potential windfall opportunities. It makes no sense whatsover that previously developed sites should be prevented from being redeveloped when they can make a valuable contribution to land supply in a sustainble fashion.

Change To Plan:

A new policy needs to be included in the Plan to recognise the potential for previously developed sites to be brought forward to development where such sites demonstrate a reasonable level of sustainability and where their development would not conflict with the key strategic objectives of the Plan.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 14502

Representation ID: 14501

OBJECT Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board represented by The Planning Consultancy (Mr Matt Gilbert)

Summary:

We support the identification of Llanfairfechan as an urban area and the recognition of its potential for significant residential development.

however, we consider that the choice of sites is incorrect and has not had propoer regard to the desirabilityo f selecting approporitate previously developed land.

We seek to promote two alternative parcels of land at Brynyneuadd Hospital as alternative, preferable parcels of land for development.

Change To Plan:

Allocate the two suggested parcels of land at Brynyneuadd Hospital.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 14501

Representation ID: 14499

OBJECT Mr Clifford & Jeffrey Frazier represented by Phillips Planning Services LTD (Mr Paul Watson)

Summary:

PPW sets out the approach for considering which sites should be allocated for housing. These have been adopted by the Council in their assessment methodology, however, in the case of the land north of Towyn Road, Abergele the Council have not taken into full account the planing hisotyr of the stie and its extant unrestricted permission for 192 residential chalets.

As such the assessment of the site is not considered robust and has not been undertaken in full view of the criteria set out within PPW.

Change To Plan:

Allocate the brownfield site at Towyn Road, Abergele in preference to other sites in the Abergele area.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 14499

Representation ID: 14490

OBJECT Mr & Mrs EA & J Watson and 1 other

Summary:

The Town Council considers the scale of growth excessive and unjustified to meet the needs of the Town and the LDP lacks a robust and credible evidence to support it, fails to demonstrate whether the community has (or is capable of delivering) the necessary infrastructure and houseuilding capacity to support growth (particularly in combination with the impacts of development proposed in Bodelwyddan) and would have impact on the culture of the Town (including the Welsh Language)

Change To Plan:

Reduce the level of housing growth.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 14490

Representation ID: 14468

OBJECT Cyngor Tref Bodelwyddan Town Council (Ms Jenny Prendergast)

Summary:

Bodelwyddan Town council passed a resolution at its meeting on 21st April 2011 to support the objections to the LDP raised by Abergele Town Council.
Bodelwyddan Town Council are also conerned that the LDP for Conwy and LDP for Denbighshire both cite large scale building of houses and industrial units within a small distance of each other.
If both these plans were to meet approval there will be a substantial strain on the infrastructure servicing both communities, the education and health services would be put under a considerable amount of pressure.

Change To Plan:

Reduce housng growth.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 14468

Representation ID: 14460

OBJECT K & C Developments (Mr C White) represented by P L Planning (Mr Peter Lloyd)

Summary:

The land (which is defined on the attached plan) is excluded from the settlement. It is logically part of the urban and built form of Conwy/Gyffin and therefore should lie within the Urban Development Strategy Area.

Detail

The land has never been located outside a development boundary in any previous adopted plan.

Prior to the adjacent land being developed for 3 dwellings, the land formed part of nursery grounds, within the same use and planning unit. This use falls within the definition of previously developed land at table 4.1 of Planning Policy Wales 2011.

Change To Plan:

For the reasons set out above K+C Developments consider that the plan in its current form is unsound. Adjustment of the settlement boundary to reflect the attached plan would correct this


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 14460

Representation ID: 14459

OBJECT Penrhyn Homes Ltd (Mr A Roberts) represented by P L Planning (Mr Peter Lloyd)

Summary:

The land is excluded from the settlement. It would be logical to follow the established boundary pattern in this part of Llysfaen and therefore should lie within the Main Village settlement boundary.

Detail

The land was included and formed part of a planning application for residential development (0/27227) in 2003. It part is surfaced and its limits can clearly be seen from the attached aerial photograph where the land is edged in red.

The land It is not green wedge or of identified landscape quality worthy of protection.

Change To Plan:

For the reasons set out above Penrhyn Homes consider that the plan in its current form is unsound. Adjustment of the settlement boundary to include the land shown on the attached aerial photograph would correct this.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 14459

Representation ID: 14445

OBJECT Beech Developments (NW) Ltd (Mr Mike Roberts) represented by The Planning Consultancy (Mr Matt Gilbert)

Summary:

Having regard to our representations elsewhere in which it has been concluded that the overall housing requirement should be increased, there is a need to identify additional housing allocations to meet the housing requirement. The contingency sites provide the obvious reserve from which the bulk of these sites should be drawn.
Land at Pentwyn Road, Deganwy is particularly suitable in this regard and should be allocated.
However, we remain concerned about the abilitiy of the identified land supply to meet even the proposed housing taget of 6800 dwellings. Our particular concern is in relation to the assumed contribution from windfalls.

Change To Plan:

The assumed level of contribution from windfalls is unrealistically high and should be amended appropriately.
The consequece of this is that insufficent site are allocated.
Pentwyn Road, Deganwy should be changed from an allocated site to a contingency site.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 14445

Representation ID: 14388

OBJECT Mr & Mrs Steven & Valeria Owen

Summary:

Under this Development Plan, the Council intends to build 7200 new homes across Conwy, with seemingly no consideration for the local impact or the infrastructure needed for this. I object to the Local Development Plan as a whole and believe that the current plan is unsuitable for a number of reasons including that national statistics show that there is no current or future need for such housing, and there is insufficient infrastructure in many villages to be able to support this. There has clearly been a lack of thought, consideration and consultation put into this plan

Change To Plan:

Reduce housing growth.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 14388

Representation ID: 14178

OBJECT Ms Rebecca Turley

Summary:

The established need for 6,800 houses is too ambitious for a county of our size to absorb. Travel to work time and cost are existing barriers to low wage employment being sustainable and affordable for existing unemployed residents. There is no significant employment development opportunities proposed within the LDP to meet existing need. Without this and with in-migration to take up new houses, total unemployment levels will soar and potentially the long term unemployed will be further disadvantaged. There are no proposals to upgrade the highways infrastructure to accommodate such high inward migration.

Change To Plan:

Reduce housing figure.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 14178

Representation ID: 14176

OBJECT Mr Paul Turley

Summary:

The established need for 6,800 houses is too ambitious for a county of our size to absorb. Travel to work time and cost are existing barriers to low wage employment being sustainable and affordable for existing unemployed residents. There is no significant employment development opportunities proposed within the LDP to meet existing need. Without this and with in-migration to take up new houses, total unemployment levels will soar and potentially the long term unemployed will be further disadvantaged. There are no proposals to upgrade the highways infrastructure to accommodate such high inward migration.

Change To Plan:

Reduce housing figure.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 14176

Representation ID: 14174

OBJECT Ms Angela Turley and 2 others

Summary:

The established need for 6,800 houses is too ambitious for a county of our size to absorb. Travel to work time and cost are existing barriers to low wage employment being sustainable and affordable for existing unemployed residents. There is no significant employment development opportunities proposed within the LDP to meet existing need. Without this and with in-migration to take up new houses, total unemployment levels will soar and potentially the long term unemployed will be further disadvantaged. There are no proposals to upgrade the highways infrastructure to accommodate such high inward migration.

Change To Plan:

Reduce housing level.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 14174

Representation ID: 14172

OBJECT Mr Mathew Turley

Summary:

The established need for 6,800 houses is too ambitious for a county of our size to absorb. Travel to work time and cost are existing barriers to low wage employment being sustainable and affordable for existing unemployed residents. There is no significant employment development opportunities proposed within the LDP to meet existing need. Without this and with in-migration to take up new houses, total unemployment levels will soar and potentially the long term unemployed will be further disadvantaged. There are no proposals to upgrade the highways infrastructure to accommodate such high inward migration.

Change To Plan:

Reduce the proposed housing level.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 14172

Representation ID: 14147

OBJECT Cllr Janet Finch-Saunders AM/AC

Summary:

In terms of the L.D.P. itself, I have spoken up on several ocassions with my genuine concerns about the actual housing numbers proposed and wish to formally place on record my firm objections to these numbers. We do not want to see the mass destruction to our green field sites and I consider these current proposals to be massive over development and is not supported by any tangible evidence.

Change To Plan:

Revise housing numbers proposed.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 14147

Representation ID: 14130

OBJECT Home Builders Federation Ltd (Mr Richard Price)

Summary:

We have concerns with the certainty of the land supply within Policy HOU/1, which are detailed below.

Over reliance on windfall sites

Empty Homes Strategy

Contingency Sites

Change To Plan:

The reliance on windfall development should be reduced and more sites should be allocated in order to introduce more certainty into the housing land supply of the LDP.

The LDP should have a new policy on the process and allocation of contingency sites


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 14130

Representation ID: 14081

OBJECT Llanrwst Town Council (Ms Gwenda M Jones)

Summary:

The Town Council question that there is a need for 150 new houses to meet the local needs in Llanrwst.
There are many empty properties in Llanrwst which local people cannot afford to buy or rent.
Other points which must be kept in mind are that
* The Sewerage Plant is too small for the needs of the town at the present.
* The Water pressure is low in the town.
* Building these houses would take away the few green spaces which we have left in the town.

Change To Plan:

Revise the housing figure for Llanrwst.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 14081

Representation ID: 13872

SUPPORT Dwr Cymru Welsh Water (Mr Rhidian Clement)

Summary:

We note the allocations identified within the Plan and we will work with your Authority and potential developers to fully support sustainable economic development. However, we believe that due consideration must be given to maintaining service standards for our customers, as well as minimising the impact on the environment from pollution that can be caused by overloaded sewerage. Therefore this policy needs to cross reference to other policies within your plan, in particular Policy DP/1, DP/3, DP/4 DP/5 and DP/6.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 13872

Representation ID: 13539

OBJECT Mr Goronwy Owen

Summary:

Cynnwys safle 435 Tir ir Dwyrain o Gorwel fel safle ar gyfer tai yn Llanfairfechan. Mae'r safle wedi'w asesu eisoes gan y cyngor ond ni gafodd ei gynnwys ar y rhestr gan fod pryderon am barcio ar ffyrdd lleol. Mae Asesiad Trafnidiaeth wedi ei gwblhau ar gyfer y safle erbyn hyn ac wedi ei gymeradwyo hyd at 30 annedd yn y man cyntaf gan swyddogion priffyrdd. Mae'r safle ar gael i ddatblygu yn syth gyda mynediad oddiar stad Gorwel.

Change To Plan:

Cynnwys safle 435 fel safle ar gyfer datblygu tai yn Llanfairfechan.


[View Our Response]

More details about Rep ID: 13539


This e-consultation system has been designed and developed by JDi Solutions for Conwy County Borough Council.
For more information, please visit www.jdi-solutions.co.uk

Page generated on: 01/10/2014
  |

Conwy County Borough Council, Bodlondeb, Conwy, North Wales, LL32 8DU.
Telephone: 01492 574000. Fax: 01492 592114. E-mail: information@conwy.gov.uk
Copyright and Disclaimers| Data Protection - Freedom of Information